50
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis

, , , , &
Pages 3907-3916 | Published online: 04 Aug 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 Selection of the included studies.

Figure 1 Selection of the included studies.

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the retrieved studies

Table 2 The assessment of the risk of bias in each cohort study using the NOS

Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.

Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Note: Weights are from random effective analysis.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3 Meta-analysis of prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, (C) PFS and (D) recurrence.

Note: Weights are from random effective analysis.
Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, (C) PFS and (D) recurrence.

Figure 4 Sensitivity analysis for the pooled prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, and (C) recurrence.

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4 Sensitivity analysis for the pooled prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, and (C) recurrence.

Table 3 Publication bias by Egger’s and Begg’s test