Figures & data
Table 1 Basic characteristics of the retrieved studies
Table 2 The assessment of the risk of bias in each cohort study using the NOS
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.
Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.
![Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.](/cms/asset/6bd471b0-6934-4af1-86f1-c122e2dc1492/dott_a_136530_f0002_b.jpg)
![Figure 2 Meta-analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, (A) tumor infiltration, (B) node metastasis, (C) TNM stage, (D) pathological grade, (E) age and (F) sex.Abbreviations: TNM, tumor–node–metastasis; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.](/cms/asset/e991b1e0-b7b8-42c3-8d08-826cd2f96576/dott_a_136530_f0002a_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Meta-analysis of prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, (C) PFS and (D) recurrence.
Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.
![Figure 3 Meta-analysis of prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, (C) PFS and (D) recurrence.](/cms/asset/817c4a46-2fca-47d0-b1bf-8aad10cdbd3e/dott_a_136530_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Sensitivity analysis for the pooled prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, and (C) recurrence.
![Figure 4 Sensitivity analysis for the pooled prognostic value, (A) OS, (B) DFS, and (C) recurrence.](/cms/asset/edcbc2de-673e-4454-9f88-cf7c5c41d247/dott_a_136530_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 3 Publication bias by Egger’s and Begg’s test