112
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Clinical significance and prospective molecular mechanism of MALAT1 in pancreatic cancer exploration: a comprehensive study based on the GeneChip, GEO, Oncomine, and TCGA databases

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 3991-4005 | Published online: 10 Aug 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Characteristics of the GEO datasets included in the meta-analysis

Figure 1 Forest plot of 27 GEO datasets evaluating the SMD of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group (a fixed-effect model).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; PC, pancreatic cancer; SMD, standard mean difference.
Figure 1 Forest plot of 27 GEO datasets evaluating the SMD of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group (a fixed-effect model).

Figure 2 Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity among 27 GEO datasets.

Note: The results were computed by omitting each dataset in turn.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus.
Figure 2 Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity among 27 GEO datasets.

Figure 3 Forest plot of 25 GEO datasets evaluating the SMD of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group after omitting two datasets (GSE15471 and GSE62165) (a fixed-effect model).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; PC, pancreatic cancer; SMD, standard mean difference.
Figure 3 Forest plot of 25 GEO datasets evaluating the SMD of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group after omitting two datasets (GSE15471 and GSE62165) (a fixed-effect model).

Figure 4 Begg’s funnel plot evaluating the publication bias among the 25 datasets.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; SMD, standard mean difference.
Figure 4 Begg’s funnel plot evaluating the publication bias among the 25 datasets.

Figure 5 Summary of the ROC curve of 25 datasets evaluating the diagnostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PC, pancreatic cancer; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SENS, sensitivity; SPEC, specificity; SROC, summary receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 5 Summary of the ROC curve of 25 datasets evaluating the diagnostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Figure 6 Forest plot of 25 datasets evaluating the diagnostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Notes: (A) Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 25 datasets. (B) Pooled diagnostic OR of 25 datasets.
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; PC, pancreatic cancer.
Figure 6 Forest plot of 25 datasets evaluating the diagnostic value of MALAT1 in PC.
Figure 6 Forest plot of 25 datasets evaluating the diagnostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Figure 7 Box plot validating the expression of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group based on the Oncomine database.

Notes: (A) The expression of MALAT1 in Grutzmann’s dataset (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MEXP-950). (B) The expression of MALAT1 in Badea’s datasets (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE15471). (C) The expression of MALAT1 in lacobuzio-Donahue’s dataset (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE3654; http://genome-www.stanford.edu/pancreatic1/index.shtml). (D) The expression of MALAT1 in Pie’s dataset (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE16515). (E) The expression of MALAT1 in Ishikawa’s dataset (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE1542).
Abbreviation: PC, pancreatic cancer.
Figure 7 Box plot validating the expression of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group based on the Oncomine database.
Figure 7 Box plot validating the expression of MALAT1 in the PC group and the healthy control group based on the Oncomine database.

Figure 8 Survival analysis evaluating the prognostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Notes: (A) Patients with PC were divided into two groups according to MALAT1 alteration. (B) Patients with PC were divided into two groups according to MALAT1 expression.
Abbreviation: PC, pancreatic cancer.
Figure 8 Survival analysis evaluating the prognostic value of MALAT1 in PC.
Figure 8 Survival analysis evaluating the prognostic value of MALAT1 in PC.

Figure 9 Significant MF network constructed by Cytoscape 3.40.

Notes: Each node represents a GO item. Colored nodes indicate significance (P<0.01). Node size represents the involved MF items.
Abbreviations: GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.
Figure 9 Significant MF network constructed by Cytoscape 3.40.

Figure 10 Hub genes obtained from the PPI network.

Note: A degree ≥10 was chosen as the cut-off point.
Abbreviation: PPI, protein–protein interaction.
Figure 10 Hub genes obtained from the PPI network.

Table 2 Significant GO and KEGG items of the overlapping genes