Figures & data
Figure 1 Flow chart showing selection of studies for meta-analysis.
![Figure 1 Flow chart showing selection of studies for meta-analysis.](/cms/asset/79fd9e5e-7063-41c1-9184-46342fe0ea2c/dott_a_12195629_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Figure 2 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR).
![Figure 2 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR).](/cms/asset/c15e678a-0fa7-4cfe-8e11-3bbbc4a3dbc2/dott_a_12195629_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in OS.
![Figure 3 Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in OS.](/cms/asset/efe5b766-d1a8-4a42-8653-39e675446918/dott_a_12195629_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of patients with HCC <3 cm. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of PMCT with HRN.
![Figure 4 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of patients with HCC <3 cm. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of PMCT with HRN.](/cms/asset/3987bebb-73e2-42c0-8c14-54166ba21332/dott_a_12195629_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR).
![Figure 5 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR).](/cms/asset/bb9612ed-13bc-496e-8de4-2e6ebcc818dc/dott_a_12195629_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR).
Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; MWA, microwave ablation; HRN, hepatic resection.
![Figure 6 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR).](/cms/asset/01f9157c-b900-4317-ac29-5b6a3112fdd8/dott_a_12195629_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in DFS.
![Figure 7 Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in DFS.](/cms/asset/c04e2e0a-fa17-4693-b2de-c807b5efff94/dott_a_12195629_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing the patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. Weights are from random effects analysis. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing PMCT with HRN.
![Figure 8 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing the patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. Weights are from random effects analysis. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing PMCT with HRN.](/cms/asset/d376fd1c-ccd7-43fa-8b84-bd97535d5592/dott_a_12195629_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the tumor recurrence between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR).
![Figure 9 Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the tumor recurrence between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR).](/cms/asset/31f430e2-c6c8-4898-8f37-8735f7397276/dott_a_12195629_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing operation time between MWA and HRN. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing blood loss between MWA and HRN. (C) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing complication between MWA and HRN. Weights are from random effects analyses.
![Figure 10 (A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing operation time between MWA and HRN. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing blood loss between MWA and HRN. (C) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing complication between MWA and HRN. Weights are from random effects analyses.](/cms/asset/026a130f-16a7-471a-9cf7-49b9644faf5a/dott_a_12195629_f0010_c.jpg)