Figures & data
Figure 1 Perceived impact of rheumatic disease, by gender (A), disease duration (B), and source of care (C).
![Figure 1 Perceived impact of rheumatic disease, by gender (A), disease duration (B), and source of care (C).](/cms/asset/c4c0be96-4f1b-428b-9c0f-8a5812f6e061/dppa_a_137052_f0001_b.jpg)
![Figure 1 Perceived impact of rheumatic disease, by gender (A), disease duration (B), and source of care (C).](/cms/asset/baa189bb-12c9-4cfe-ba38-d321966d5fcd/dppa_a_137052_f0001a_b.jpg)
Table 1 Perceived impact of the rheumatic disease on daily life domains and associated variables
Table 2 Rheumatologists’ behavior as perceived by patients
Figure 2 Patients’ attribution of importance to each treatment feature.
Abbreviation: QoL, quality of life.
![Figure 2 Patients’ attribution of importance to each treatment feature.](/cms/asset/4c686a1e-8ee4-4336-948a-c9af41f02393/dppa_a_137052_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Patients’ satisfaction with current antirheumatic therapy.
Abbreviation: QoL, quality of life.
![Figure 3 Patients’ satisfaction with current antirheumatic therapy.](/cms/asset/b7d9e0c8-6a41-4eda-9b74-ed4b2b179d0e/dppa_a_137052_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Patients’ satisfaction with current antirheumatic therapy, by the perception on impact on quality of life (moderate/severe versus none/mild).
Abbreviation: QoL, quality of life.
![Figure 4 Patients’ satisfaction with current antirheumatic therapy, by the perception on impact on quality of life (moderate/severe versus none/mild).](/cms/asset/9b944ca2-830e-4202-b5db-07771212ec43/dppa_a_137052_f0004_b.jpg)