779
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Which eHealth interventions are most effective for smoking cessation? A systematic review

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2065-2084 | Published online: 08 Oct 2018

Figures & data

Table 1 “Textword” searches

Table 2 Subgroups of effect modifiers employed in the meta-analysis and meta-regression

Figure 1 PRISMA diagram of searching and screening process.

Abbreviation: eHealth, electronic health; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 1 PRISMA diagram of searching and screening process.

Table 3 General characteristics of included studies (n=91)

Figure 2 Risk of bias graph based on review authors’ judgments across all included studies.

Figure 2 Risk of bias graph based on review authors’ judgments across all included studies.

Figure 3 Forest plot of web based intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Abbreviations: M–H, Mantel–Haenszel; NRT, nicotine replacement therapy.
Figure 3 Forest plot of web based intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Figure 4 Forest plot of mHealth intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Abbreviations: eHealth, electronic health; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel; mHealth, mobile health.
Figure 4 Forest plot of mHealth intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Figure 5 Forest plot of computer-assisted intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Abbreviation: M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.
Figure 5 Forest plot of computer-assisted intervention effects by characteristics of control group.

Table 4 Summary of findings on effects of eHealth smoking cessation interventions, based on GRADE guidelines

Table 5 Core effect modifier using meta-regression, stratified by eHealth platforms