245
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors Driving Patient Preferences for Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) Injection Regimen and Injection Device Features: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Pages 781-793 | Published online: 30 Apr 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 Example of r-hGH injection and device descriptions.

Figure 1 Example of r-hGH injection and device descriptions.

Table 1 Attribute and Level Grid

Table 2 Fixed Attribute Grid Profiles for Hypothetical Products X, Y, Z

Figure 2 Example discrete choice experiment question.

Figure 2 Example discrete choice experiment question.

Table 3 Patient Characteristics

Table 4 Caregiver Characteristics (Caregivers of Patients 3–18 Years [N=149])

Figure 3 Average relative importance of attributes. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 3 Average relative importance of attributes. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 4 Average relative importance of attributes by patient cohort. Base: All patients (Total weighted, Adult, n=75; Adolescent Dyad, n=79; Pediatric Dyad, n=70).

Figure 4 Average relative importance of attributes by patient cohort. Base: All patients (Total weighted, Adult, n=75; Adolescent Dyad, n=79; Pediatric Dyad, n=70).

Figure 5 Average relative utility of injection schedule attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 5 Average relative utility of injection schedule attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 6 Average relative utility of preparation attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 6 Average relative utility of preparation attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 7 Average relative utility of injection device attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 7 Average relative utility of injection device attribute. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224).

Figure 8 Percentage of participants that would choose the new profile over current treatment. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224; Adult, n=75; Adolescent Dyad, n=79; Pediatric Dyad, n=70).

Figure 8 Percentage of participants that would choose the new profile over current treatment. Base: All patients (Total weighted, n=224; Adult, n=75; Adolescent Dyad, n=79; Pediatric Dyad, n=70).