Measurement of the Quality of Life of Prolanis Hypertension Patients in Sixteen Primary Healthcare Centers in Pandeglang District, Banten Province, Indonesia, Using EQ-5D-5L Instrument

Figures & data

Table 1 Sociodemographic and Utility of Hypertension Patients at 16 PHCs in Pandeglang District

Age	Frequency	Percentage	Average Utility Index (Meeting-1)
20–35 years	0	0%	–
36–50 years	37	39%	0.80
>50 years	59	61%	0.74
Gender	96	100%
Female	77	80%	0.76
Male	19	20%	0.80
Blood Pressure Control	96	100%
1 time/month	6	6%	0.74
2 times/month	7	7%	0.80
3 times/month	20	21%	0.85
4 times/month	63	66%	0.73
Hypertension Therapy	96	100%
Monotherapy	82	85%	0.75
Combination therapy	14	15%	0.84
Occupation	96	100%
Housewife	51	53%	0.74
Civil servant/Entrepreneur/Farmer/Labour/Private employee/Fisherman	43	45%	0.80
Others	2	2%	0.70
Education Level	96	100%
Elementary school	57	59%	0.75
Junior high school	15	16%	0.80
Senior high school	17	18%	0.81
College	7	7%	0.72
	96	100%

Note: Data processing researchers from the results of medical records and interviews.

Table 2 Utility Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Prolanis Hypertension Patients in 16 PHC in Pandeglang District

Parameter	Meeting 1		Meeting 2		Meeting 3		Meeting 4
Utility Index (Level 1)	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control
Mobility (%)	56.25	62.50	68.75	66.67	89.58	81.25	100	83
Self-Care (%)	79.17	89.58	93.75	91.67	95.83	93.75	98	90
Usual Activities (%)	66.67	75	83.33	79.17	93.75	85.42	96	79
Pain/Discomfort (%)	8.33	22.92	20.83	29.17	56.25	50	69	50
Anxiety / Depression (%)	45.83	77.08	64.58	85.42	85.42	91.67	96	81
Mean utility index (level-1) %	51.25	65.42	66.25	70.42	84.17	80.42	91.67	76.67
Mean utility index (0–1)	0.71	0.82	0.83	0.86	0.91	0.90	0.92	0.90
Asymp.Sig.(0.000)^a		–			–	–
Asymp.Sig.(2-tailed)^b (intervention)		62.5% (p=0.012)			58.3% (p=0.012)	8.3% (p=0.609)
Asymp.Sig.(2-tailed)^b (control)		48% (p=0.008)			48% (p=0.008)	2% (p=0.655)
Positive Ranks^c (intervention)		30			28	4
Positive Ranks^c (control)		23			23	1
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control
Mean (VAS)	62.92	68.77	71.15	73.58	75.58	77.44	77.44	77.56
≥80% (person)	1	5	3	6	13	17	20	17

Notes: ^aKruskal–Wallis Test; ^bMann–Whitney Test; ^cWilcoxon dan Binomial Test.