108
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Modified Gait Efficacy Scale for Patients Removing Ilizarov External Fixation Device for Over One Year

, , , &
Pages 1307-1315 | Published online: 30 Jul 2020

Figures & data

Table 1 Pre-Testing Patient Characteristics (N =5)

Table 2 Sample Characteristics (N=102)

Figure 1 Patients’ mGES score distribution. Mean = 50.4, Standard deviation (line) = 13.65, N = 102.

Abbreviation: mGES, the modified Gait Efficacy Scale.

Figure 1 Patients’ mGES score distribution. Mean = 50.4, Standard deviation (line) = 13.65, N = 102.Abbreviation: mGES, the modified Gait Efficacy Scale.

Figure 2 Standardized factor loading and residuals for the items of the mGES.

Abbreviation: mGES, the modified Gait Efficacy Scale.

Figure 2 Standardized factor loading and residuals for the items of the mGES.Abbreviation: mGES, the modified Gait Efficacy Scale.

Table 3 Symmetry Measure of the Chinese Version mGES

Figure 3 Individual agreement between test and retest scores of the Chinese version mGES. The horizontal solid line represents the mean difference between both scores. The dashed line represents the linear regression line through the data points. The outer dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference±1.96 SD of the difference).

Figure 3 Individual agreement between test and retest scores of the Chinese version mGES. The horizontal solid line represents the mean difference between both scores. The dashed line represents the linear regression line through the data points. The outer dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference±1.96 SD of the difference).

Table 4 Spearman Correlations Between mGES and Other Measures