A Study of the Relationship Among Burned Patients’ Resilience and Self-Efficacy and Their Quality of Life

Figures & data

Table 1 The Demographic Characteristics of the Participants

Variable		N (%)	Variable		N (%)
Sex	Female	183 (60)	Age (years)	20–29	102 (33.4)
				30–39	115 (37.7)
				40–49	82 (26.9)
				>50	6 (2)
	Male	121 (39.7)	Area of burns	Head &face	36 (11.8)
				Arm	168 (55.1)
				More than one area	101 (33.1)
Marital status	Single	86 (28.2)	Household status	Urban	208 (68.2)
	Married	198 (64.9)		Rural	97 (31.8)
	Wife died	12 (3.9)
	Divorced	9 (3)
Educational level	Illiterate	2 (0.7)	Income	Low	263 (86.2)
	Primary	4 (1.3)		Moderate	36 (11.8)
	Secondary to diploma	298 (97.7)		Good	6 (2)
	Academic	1 (0.3)
Job	Employee	43 (14.1)	Degree of burns	1	53 (17.4)
	Self-employed	63 (20.7)		2	177 (58)
	Jobless	35 (11.5)		3	63 (20.7)
	Housewife	163 (53.4)		4	12 (3.9)
The time of damage	6–12 months	253 (79.89)	TBA%	15–30	48 (15.6)
	≥13 months	52 (20.11)		31–45	192 (56)
				46–60	65 (28.4)

Table 2 The Relationship Between the Study Variables and Quality of Life

Variable	Quality of Life
	β	SE	Beta	t	R^2	P value
Resiliency	1.05	0.08	0.58	12.41	0.39	<0.001
Self-efficacy	0.20	0.01	0.63	14.39		<0.001
Age	−0.55	0.42	−0.07	−1.28		0.2
Education level	1.02	0.18	0.29	5.45		<0.001
Income	0.20	0.09	0.12	2.14		0.03
Degree of burns	−0.09	0.04	−0.12	−2.001		0.02
TBSA%	−0.19	0.51	−0.39	−0.60		0.43
Marital status	2.61	0.53	0.27	4.88		<0.001
Household status	−1.46	0.73	−0.61	−4.71		<0.001
The time of damage	0.04	0.48	0.08	4.10		0.28