211
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Exploring the Agreement Between Self-Reported Medication Adherence and Pharmacy Refill-Based Measures in Patients with Kidney Disease

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 3465-3477 | Received 03 Sep 2022, Accepted 13 Dec 2022, Published online: 30 Dec 2022

Figures & data

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Study Sample Comparing Non-Dialysis CKD Patients and KF Patients

Table 2 Results of Measures of Self-Reported and Pharmacy Refill-Based Medication Adherence for the Overall Sample and CKD, KF Sub-Groups

Table 3 The Trend of Pharmacy Refill-Based Markers of Medication Adherence Among MMAS Categories of Self-Reported Adherence

Table 4 MMAS Scores in Patients with High vs Low Adherence Category Based on MPR and PDC for Antihypertensives and Other Cardiometabolic Medications

Table 5 Cohen’s Kappa Exploring Agreement Between Low Adherence MMAS Category (MMAS Score <0.6) and Low Adherence Based on Pharmacy Refill-Based Measures for MPR & PDC (<0.8)

Table 6 Bias and Limits of Agreement for the Parameter Estimate as per Bland Altman Plots Evaluating Agreement Between MMAS Score and Pharmacy Refill-Based Measures

Figure 1 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and MPR of antihypertensives.

Figure 1 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and MPR of antihypertensives.

Figure 2 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and PDC of antihypertensives.

Figure 2 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and PDC of antihypertensives.

Figure 3 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and MPR of cardiometabolic medications.

Figure 3 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and MPR of cardiometabolic medications.

Figure 4 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and PDC of cardiometabolic medications.

Figure 4 Bland Altman plots exploring agreement between MMAS and PDC of cardiometabolic medications.