Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study

Figures & data

Table 1 General Information of Interviewed Patients (n = 15)

Code	Gender	Age	Occupation	Education Level	Marital Status	Place of Permanent Residence	Type of Medical Insurance	Annual Household Income (RMB 10,000)	Medical Burden
P1	Male	41	Farmer	Tertiary/undergraduate	Married	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	0.5–1	Heavy
P2	Male	25	Farmer	Elementary or below	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	1–3	Slight
P3	Male	39	Self-employed	Senior high school/ technical secondary school	Married	Urban	Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance	8–20	Slight
P4	Male	45	Farmer	Junior high school	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	<0.5	Heavy
P5	Male	19	Student	Tertiary/undergraduate	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	3–8	Moderate
P6	Male	33	Laborer	Tertiary/undergraduate	Married	Urban	Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance	3–8	Moderate
P7	Male	37	Other	Tertiary/undergraduate	Divorced	Urban	Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance	3–8	Moderate
P8	Male	46	Laborer	Senior high school/ technical secondary school	Married	Urban	Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance	1–3	Moderate
P9	Male	20	Corporate employee	Tertiary/undergraduate	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	3–8	Slight
P10	Male	35	Farmer	Elementary or below	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	<0.5	No burden
P11	Male	45	Farmer	Junior high school	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	3–8	Moderate
P12	Male	22	Student	Tertiary/undergraduate	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	1–3	Heavy
P13	Male	23	Other	Elementary or below	Unmarried	Urban	Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance	3–8	Moderate
P14	Male	15	Student	Junior high school	Unmarried	Rural	New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme	<0.5	Moderate
P15	Male	55	Other	Senior high school/Technical secondary school	Married	Urban	Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance	8–20	Slight

Note: The characteristics and numbers of respondents are in bold in the table.

Table 2 General Information of Interviewed Caregivers (n = 10)

Code	Gender	Age	Occupation	Education Level	Marital Status	Place of Permanent Residence	Relationship with Patient
C1	Male	35	Other	Postgraduate or above	Married	Urban	Father
C2	Male	46	Farmer	Elementary or below	Married	Rural	Father
C3	Female	38	Self-employed	Tertiary/undergraduate	Divorced	Urban	Mother
C4	Male	30	Corporate employee	Tertiary/undergraduate	Unmarried	Urban	Friend
C5	Male	35	Farmer	Elementary or below	Unmarried	Rural	Father
C6	Female	51	Freelancer	Senior high school/technical secondary school	Married	Urban	Mother
C7	Female	48	Corporate employee	Junior high school	Married	Urban	Mother
C8	Male	42	Farmer	Junior high school	Married	Urban	Father
C9	Female	46	Corporate employee	Junior high school	Married	Urban	Mother
C10	Male	19	Student	Tertiary/undergraduate	Unmarried	Rural	Sibling

Note: The characteristics and numbers of respondents are in bold in the table.

Table 3 General Information of Interviewed Healthcare Providers (n = 7)

Code	Gender	Age	Job Title	Years of Service	Position	Current Department/Ward	Highest Level of Education
D1	Female	51	Associate Chief Therapist	28	N/A	Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy	Undergraduate
D2	Male	49	Associate Chief Therapist	25	N/A	Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy	Undergraduate
D3	Male	50	Associate Chief Physician	23	N/A	Hematology	Master’s
D4	Male	39	Attending Physician	12	N/A	Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy	Master’s
N1	Female	46	Associate Chief Nurse	27	Head Nurse	Hematology	Undergraduate
N2	Female	37	Charge Nurse	13	N/A	Hematology	Undergraduate
N3	Female	35	Charge Nurse	11	N/A	Hematology	Undergraduate

Note: The characteristics and numbers of respondents are in bold in the table.