The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Relational-Self and the Collective-Self During Attention Processing

Figures & data

Figure 1 Illustration of the stimuli and procedures of the dot-probe task used in the experiment.

Table 1 Summary of the Eye-Movement Data for the HR and LR Information Under the Relational Self and Collective Self Conditions

Variable	Self Type	Relational Self		Collective Self
		M	SD	M	SD
Direction of initial gaze bias (%)	HR	52.61	9.68	51.37	12.05
	LR	48.11	11.99	45.61	11.68
First fixation latency bias (ms)	HR	−8.71	137.95	12.51	129.89
	LR	42.24	122.65	22.91	143.52
First fixation duration bias (ms)	HR	46.93	99.32	26.65	201.79
	LR	−6.58	94.66	−22.11	156.01
Gaze duration bias (%)	HR	55.58	7.66	50.26	9.37
	LR	51.82	6.65	50.82	10.22
Remainder trials (%)	HR	92.02	6.01	93.31	9.17
	LR	89.23	6.01	89.44	10.92

Table 2 RT Data and RT Bias Scores for Specific Information Types Under the Relational and Collective Self Conditions

Location		Relational Self (n = 38)		Collective Self (n = 38)
Words	Dot Probe	M	SD	M	SD
HR
Left	Right	471.86	89.40	470.46	102.42
Left	Left	449.36	76.18	462.41	90.83
Right	Left	479.03	102.80	468.91	85.47
Right	Right	458.31	77.14	457.30	82.35
RT-bias		21.56	37.66	9.72	29.89
LR
Left	Right	466.52	74.68	466.43	73.90
Left	Left	462.86	63.91	469.51	91.15
Right	Left	481.76	90.10	471.15	94.83
Right	Right	474.44	91.17	472.04	96.39
RT-bias		5.17	36.07	−1.85	29.83

Figure 2 The mean RT bias scores for HR and LR information under the relational and collective self conditions.

Note: *p < 0.05.

Figure 3 The mean direction of the initial gaze bias scores for the HR and LR information under the relational and collective self conditions.

Note: *p < 0.05.

Figure 4 The mean first fixation duration bias scores for the HR and LR information under the relational and collective self conditions.

Note: *p < 0.05.

Figure 5 The mean gaze duration bias scores for HR and LR information in the relational and collective self conditions.

Note: *p < 0.05.