How Green Mindfulness and Green Shared Vision Interact to Influence Green Creative Behavior

Figures & data

Figure 1 Conceptual model.

Table 1 Validity and Reliability for Constructs

	Loadings	AVE	CR	Cronbach’s Alpha
Green mindfulness		0.561	0.853	0.826
GMFN1	0.719
GMFN2	0.832
GMFN3	0.623
GMFN4	0.812
GMFN5	0.742
GMFN6	0.745
Green shared vision		0.511	0.878	0.845
GSV1	0.645
GSV2	0.723
GSV3	0.753
GSV4	0.735
Green intrinsic motivation		0.532	0.890	0.887
GIM1	0.653
GIM2	0.723
GIM3	0.723
GIM4	0.642
GIM5	0.753
GIM6	0.864
Green creative behavior		0.556	0.812	0.778
GCB1	0.753
GCB2	0.764
GCB3	0.775
GCB4	0.772
GCB5	0.726
GCB6	0.678

Abbreviations: GMFN, green mindfulness; GSV, green shared vision; GIM, green intrinsic motivation; GCB, green creative behavior; AVE, average variance extracted; CR, composite reliability.

Table 2 Discriminant Validity

	Fornell-Larcker Criterion				HTMT Criterion
	GMFN	GSV	GIM	GCB	GMFN	GSV	GIM	GCB
GMFN	0.748
GSV	0.513	0.714			0.634 CI.0.900 [0.549;0.714]
GIM	0.553	0.424	0.729		0.823 CI.0.900 [0.761;0.885]	0.664 CI.0.900 [0.615;0.732]
GCB	0.634	0.652	0.553	0.745	0.495 CI.0.900 [0.443;0.573]	0.734 CI.0.900 [0.650;0.795]	0.763 CI.0.900 [0.716;0.842]

Abbreviations: GMFN, green mindfulness; GSV, green shared vision; GIM, green intrinsic motivation; GCB, green creative behavior; CI, bootstrapping 90% confidence intervals (n=5000) (one-tailed).

Table 3 Effects on Endogenous Variables

Hypotheses	β	CI (5%, 95%)	SE	t-value	p-value	Decision	f^2	R^2	Q^2
Age^a	0.021(n.s.)	(−0.049, 0.043)	0.032	0.523	0.512
Gender^b	0.078(n.s.)	(−0.010, 0.121)	0.068	0.653	0.635
Occupation^c	0.034(n.s.)	(−0.051, 0.087)	0.022	0.262	0.542
Tenure^d	0.074(n.s.)	(−0.012, 0.149)	0.040	0.824	0.642
H1 GMFN → GCB	0.449***	(0.363, 0.519)	0.080	11.251	0.000	Supported	0.262	0.542	0.343
H2 GMFN → GIM	0.488***	(0.411, 0.568)	0.062	10.735	0.000	Supported	0.341	0.568	0.435
H4 GMFN x GSV → GIM	0.420***	(0.330, 0.499)	0.050	8.525	0.000	Supported	0.267
H5 GMFN x GSV → GCB	0.374***	(0.280, 0.478)	0.051	4.602	0.001	Supported	0.232

Notes: ***significance p < 0.05 (1.96); ^a,b,c,d= control variables.

Abbreviations: GMFN, green mindfulness; GSV, green shared vision; GIM, green intrinsic motivation; GCB, green creative behavior.

Figure 2 Interaction effect of green mindfulness and green shared vision on green intrinsic motivation.

Figure 3 Interaction effect of green mindfulness and green shared vision on GCB.

Table 4 Summary of Mediating Effect Tests

	Path	t-value	BCCI		Path	t-value	95% BCCI	Decision	VAF
Total effect GMFN → GCB	0.744	10.322	(0.654, 0.802)	Indirect effect GMFN → GIM → GCB	0.294	8.421	(0.235, 0.370)	Supported	39.51%

Abbreviations: GMFN, green mindfulness; GSV, green shared vision; GIM, green intrinsic motivation; GCB, green creative behavior; VAF, variance accounted for (indirect effect / total effect) total effect: direct effect + indirect effect).

Table 5 Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI)

Constructs	AVE	R^2
GMFN	0.561
GSV	0.511
GIM	0.532	0.542
GCB	0.556	0.568
Average scores	0.540	0.555
	0.547

Abbreviations: AVE, average variance extracted; GMFN, green mindfulness; GSV, green shared vision; GIM, green intrinsic motivation; GCB, green creative behavior.