Advanced search
Publication Cover
Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Volume 7, 2016 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
607
Views
74
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Internet interventions for smoking cessation among adults

Amanda L Graham1 Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA;2 Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center/Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
Kelly M Carpenter3 Alere Wellbeing, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Sarah Cha1 Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA
,
Sam Cole3 Alere Wellbeing, Seattle, WA, USA
,
Megan A Jacobs1 Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA
,
Margaret Raskob3 Alere Wellbeing, Seattle, WA, USA
&
Heather Cole-Lewis4 Johnson & Johnson Health and Wellness Solutions, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA;5 ICF International, Rockville, MD, USA
 show all
Pages 55-69 | Published online: 18 May 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Abbreviation: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 2 (A) Risk of bias summary; (B) risk of bias graph.

Notes: “+” = low risk of bias; “−” = high risk of bias; “?” = unclear risk of bias.
Figure 2 (A) Risk of bias summary; (B) risk of bias graph.

Figure 3 Internet interventions compared to assessment-only/waitlist control.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3 Internet interventions compared to assessment-only/waitlist control.

Figure 4 Static Internet interventions compared to self-help print materials.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4 Static Internet interventions compared to self-help print materials.

Figure 5 Interactive Internet interventions compared to self-help print materials.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5 Interactive Internet interventions compared to self-help print materials.

Figure 6 Internet interventions compared to face-to-face intervention.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6 Internet interventions compared to face-to-face intervention.

Figure 7 Internet interventions compared to telephone counseling.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 7 Internet interventions compared to telephone counseling.

Figure 8 Internet interventions compared to other websites.

Notes: Comparisons are as follows: An et alCitation40: 0, personally tailored health information vs general lifestyle content; 1, personally tailored health information + peer coaching vs general lifestyle content; 2, personally tailored health information + peer coaching vs personally tailored health information. Fraser et alCitation38: Smokefree.gov vs “lite” version of website. McClure et alCitation54: 0, message tone (motivational/prescriptive); 1, testimonials (yes/no); 2, navigation (autonomous vs dictated); 3, email prompts (yes/no). Muñoz et alCitation68: 0, static website + email vs static website; 1, static website + email + mood management; 2, static website + email + mood management + bulletin board vs static website. Stanczyk et alCitation74: 0, tailored text-based website vs generic website; 1, tailored video-based website vs generic website.
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 8 Internet interventions compared to other websites.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.