Figures & data
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study patients (1:2 propensity score-matched sitagliptin and metformin cohorts)
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier curves for cumulative hazard of a primary composite end point.
![Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier curves for cumulative hazard of a primary composite end point.](/cms/asset/f036547f-7095-4149-b9be-b77fc4d3868b/dtcr_a_105285_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curves for cumulative hazard of a secondary composite end point.
![Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier curves for cumulative hazard of a secondary composite end point.](/cms/asset/b59261e3-633a-4afa-8a20-7041c8fbdb1e/dtcr_a_105285_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Propensity score-matched analysis for incidence rates and relative risks of CVD complications associated with sitagliptin versus metformin
Table 3 Subgroup analyses for incidence rates and relative risks of CVD complications associated with sitagliptin versus metformin in patients with high CV risk factors
Table 4 Propensity score-matched analysis for safety end points