168
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Exercise habituation is effective for improvement of periodontal disease status: a prospective intervention study

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 565-574 | Published online: 20 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Table 1 Results of the questionnaire survey and medical interview pre- to postintervention

Table 2 Periodontal disease tests and bacterial quantities, amount of change from pre- to postintervention

Table 3 Amount of change in body weight and blood test results from pre- to postintervention

Table 4 Amount of change in body weight and blood tests from pre- to postintervention

Figure 1 Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient between the change in periodontal tests and the copy count of Treponema denticola. (A) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the median percentage of the number of teeth with PPD ≥4 mm (correlation coefficient r=0.417, significant difference P=0.003). (B) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the median percentage of teeth with BOP (correlation coefficient r=0.362, significant difference P=0.010).

Abbreviations: BOP, bleeding on probing; PPD, probing pocket depth.
Figure 1 Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient between the change in periodontal tests and the copy count of Treponema denticola. (A) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the median percentage of the number of teeth with PPD ≥4 mm (correlation coefficient r=0.417, significant difference P=0.003). (B) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the median percentage of teeth with BOP (correlation coefficient r=0.362, significant difference P=0.010).

Figure 2 Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient between the change in body weight and blood tests and the copy count of Treponema denticola. (A) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in body weight (correlation coefficient r=0.373, significant difference P=0.008). (B) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in LDL-C (correlation coefficient r=0.282, significant difference P=0.049). (C) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in fasting insulin (correlation coefficient r=0.293, significant difference P=0.041).

Abbreviation: LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 2 Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient between the change in body weight and blood tests and the copy count of Treponema denticola. (A) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in body weight (correlation coefficient r=0.373, significant difference P=0.008). (B) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in LDL-C (correlation coefficient r=0.282, significant difference P=0.049). (C) Correlation between the change in the copy count of T. denticola and the change in fasting insulin (correlation coefficient r=0.293, significant difference P=0.041).

Table 5 Correlation between change in the copy count of periodontal disease-causing bacteria and body weight, blood test results

Table 6 Correlation between change in the copy count of periodontal disease-causing bacteria and body weight, blood test results