Figures & data
Figure 1 Flowchart of participants in the study.
![Figure 1 Flowchart of participants in the study.](/cms/asset/f25cf96e-f782-4d78-80c5-f515cc5a09bb/dtcr_a_179334_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Prevalence of different HR-HPV infection styles and patients with different pathological results.
Abbreviations: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HR-HPV, high-risk human papillomavirus; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; SI, simple infection; DI, double infection; TI, triple infection.
![Figure 2 Prevalence of different HR-HPV infection styles and patients with different pathological results.](/cms/asset/549eec39-6d28-42d0-87f2-58947e2c8ed9/dtcr_a_179334_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 The distribution of HR-HPV infection in different cytology results (N=10,229) (n (%))
Table 2 Compare HR-HPV infection and cytology with pathological diagnosis in 9,748 patients
Figure 3 Prevalence of HR-HPV infection and a cervical lesion in different age stratification.
Abbreviations: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HR-HPV, high-risk human papillomavirus.
![Figure 3 Prevalence of HR-HPV infection and a cervical lesion in different age stratification.](/cms/asset/dda9b5ea-9be6-40ec-8f6d-836c8c8650b6/dtcr_a_179334_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Combining Cervista® with TCT to detect CIN2+/CIN3+.
Abbreviations: CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse; CIN3+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or worse
![Figure 4 Combining Cervista® with TCT to detect CIN2+/CIN3+.](/cms/asset/e9923504-ef6d-4ada-bf00-b082a2f1119c/dtcr_a_179334_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3 Comparing cytology and HR-HPV with co-testing in different degree of the cervical lesion (N=9,748)