150
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Carvedilol vs endoscopic band ligation for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis

, , , &
Pages 191-200 | Published online: 29 Jan 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1 Study selection flow diagram.

Figure 1 Study selection flow diagram.

Table 1 Clinical features of patients in the included studies

Figure 2 Risk of bias.

Notes: (A) Risk of bias graph. (B) Risk of bias summary.
Figure 2 Risk of bias.

Figure 3 Fixed-effect model of variceal bleeding.

Notes: (A) Forest plots for carvedilol use vs EBL for prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. (B) Forest plots for carvedilol use vs EBL for primary prevention.
Abbreviation: EBL, endoscopic band ligation.
Figure 3 Fixed-effect model of variceal bleeding.

Figure 4 Funnel plot of carvedilol use vs EBL.

Notes: (A) For first and second prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. (B) For first prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
Abbreviations: EBL, endoscopic band ligation; RR, risk ratio.
Figure 4 Funnel plot of carvedilol use vs EBL.

Figure 5 Carvedilol vs EBL for prophylaxis.

Notes: (A) All-cause deaths. (B) Bleeding-related deaths.
Abbreviation: EBL, endoscopic band ligation.
Figure 5 Carvedilol vs EBL for prophylaxis.

Figure 6 Forest plots of adverse events.

Notes: (A) Five studies. (B) Four studies.
Abbreviation: EBL, endoscopic band ligation.
Figure 6 Forest plots of adverse events.

Table 2 Outcomes reported in the included studies