63
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of the acute-phase response after laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 371-378 | Published online: 26 Sep 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flowchart of patient population with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) treated with totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) or open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Figure 1 Flowchart of patient population with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) treated with totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) or open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients treated with either totally laparoscopic or open aortobifemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease

Figure 2 Comparing mean serum level of interleukin-6 (pg/mL) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Notes: Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). Timepoints: 1, before surgery; 2, after completion of distal anastomosis and flow to one of the lower limbs was reestablished; 3, 6 hours after beginning of surgery; 4, 12 hours after beginning of surgery; 5, 24 hours after beginning of surgery; 6, at discharge from hospital.
Figure 2 Comparing mean serum level of interleukin-6 (pg/mL) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Figure 3 Comparing mean serum level of Interleukin-8 (pg/mL) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Notes: Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). Timepoints: 1, before surgery; 2, after completion of distal anastomosis and flow to one of the lower limbs was reestablished; 3, 6 hours after beginning of surgery; 4, 12 hours after beginning of surgery; 5, 24 hours after beginning of surgery; 6, at discharge from hospital.
Figure 3 Comparing mean serum level of Interleukin-8 (pg/mL) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Figure 4 Comparing mean serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Notes: Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). Timepoints: 1, before surgery; 2, after completion of distal anastomosis and flow to one of the lower limbs was reestablished; 3, 6 hours after beginning of surgery; 4, 12 hours after beginning of surgery; 5, 24 hours after beginning of surgery; 6, at discharge from hospital.
Figure 4 Comparing mean serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) at different time points during and after totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF).

Table 2 Comparison of area under curve (AUC) in laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF) for the serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP)

Table 3 The effect of laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF) on serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP), controlling for the confounding effect of coronary heart disease, using the general estimated equations (GEE) model

Table 4 Operation-related parameters for patients treated with either totally laparoscopic or open aortobifemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease

Table 5 Clinical outcome after laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABF) versus open aortobifemoral bypass (OABF)