Figures & data
Table 1 CNV therapies currently approved or under clinical development
Table 2 Summary of significant risk factors for age-related macular degeneration
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the anecortave acetate, a unique synthetic cortisene. Modifications made to the cortisol parent molecule are shown.
![Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the anecortave acetate, a unique synthetic cortisene. Modifications made to the cortisol parent molecule are shown.](/cms/asset/f47ca4f3-790d-460b-80b4-48722f29dc71/dcia_a_13237_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 3 Summary of the in vitro and in vivo models of neovascularization used to evaluate the antiangiogenic properties of anecortave acetate
Figure 2 The unique design of the blunt tinted posterior juxtascleral depot cannula ensures that anecortave acetate is delivered directly behind the macula while leaving the globe intact.
![Figure 2 The unique design of the blunt tinted posterior juxtascleral depot cannula ensures that anecortave acetate is delivered directly behind the macula while leaving the globe intact.](/cms/asset/d9894f33-ce23-455a-94cc-956462fed130/dcia_a_13237_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 The counter pressure device prevents reflux of anecortave acetate when placed as posterior as possible in position with the posterior juxtascleral depot cannula.
![Figure 3 The counter pressure device prevents reflux of anecortave acetate when placed as posterior as possible in position with the posterior juxtascleral depot cannula.](/cms/asset/23825f0e-4ec3-495b-bc17-8ac665949b8c/dcia_a_13237_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 4 Percentages of adverse events attributed to the posterior juxtascleral administration or sham procedure
Figure 4 Evidence supports use of counter pressure device (CPD) for managing reflux. Plasma concentrations of anecortave desacetate in patients with the CPD (C-04-50) were the same as the plasma concentrations in patients without the CPD and had no reflux (C-02-47). Patients (C-02-47) with reflux had 4 fold lower levels of anecortave desacetate than patients without reflux. In the C-04-50 study, the CPD prevented reflux in 100% of the patients.
![Figure 4 Evidence supports use of counter pressure device (CPD) for managing reflux. Plasma concentrations of anecortave desacetate in patients with the CPD (C-04-50) were the same as the plasma concentrations in patients without the CPD and had no reflux (C-02-47). Patients (C-02-47) with reflux had 4 fold lower levels of anecortave desacetate than patients without reflux. In the C-04-50 study, the CPD prevented reflux in 100% of the patients.](/cms/asset/2d13fb61-94c5-4dce-b5d7-80c50034f2d1/dcia_a_13237_f0004_c.jpg)