Figures & data
Table 1 Different genotypic resistance scores for atazanavir (boosted or unboosted) in relation to clinical responses
Table 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters at steady state after atazanavir 400 mg once daily and after atazanavir 300 mg with ritonavir 100 mg once daily with a light meal in HIV-infected patients
Table 3 Main drug interactions with atazanavir 400 mg or atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg/day
Table 4 Main randomized studies with atazanavir in antiretroviral-naïve patients
Table 5 Main randomized studies with atazanavir in antiretroviral-experienced patients with virologic failure
Table 6 Main switch studies with atazanavir
ColonnoRThiryALimoliKParkinNActivities of atazanavir (BMS-232632) against a large panel of HIV type 1 clinical isolates resistant to one or more approved protease inhibitorsAntimicrob Agents Chemother20034741324133312654666 VoraSMarcelinAGGunthardHClinical validation of atazanavir/ritonavir genotypic resistance score in protease inhibitor-experienced patientsAIDS2006201354016327317 PellegrinIBreilhDRagnaudJMVirological responses to atazanavir-ritonavir-based regimens: resistance substitutions score and pharmacokinetic parameters (Reyaphar study)Antivir Ther200611442142916856615 BertoliASantoroMMLorenziniPDifferent patterns of mutations involved in the genotypic resistance score for atazanavir boosted versus atazanavir unboosted in multiply failing patientsAntivir Ther200611 suppl 1S99 SanneIPilieroPSquiresKThiryASchnittmanSAI424–007 Clinical Trial GroupResults of a phase 2 clinical trial at 48 weeks (AI424–007): A dose-ranging, safety, and efficacy comparative trial of atazanavir at three doses in combination with didanosine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjectsJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2003321182912514410 MurphyRSanneICahnPDose-ranging, randomized, clinical trial of atazanavir with lamivudine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 48-week resultsAIDS200317182603261414685054 SquiresKLazzarinAGatellJMComparison of once-daily atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose ZDV and lamivudine, as initial therapy for patients infected with HIVJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr20043651011101915247553 MolinaJAndrade-VillanuevaJEchevarriaJOnce-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE studyLancet2008372963964665518722869 MalanDKrantzEDavidNEfficacy and safety of atazanavir, with or without ritonavir, as part of once-daily highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patientsJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr20084716116717971713 SmithKWeinbergWDejesusEFosamprenavir or atazanavir once daily boosted with ritonavir 100 mg, plus tenofovir/emtricitabine, for the initial treatment of HIV infection: 48-week results of ALERTAIDS Res Ther20085518373851 HaasDZalaCSchraderSTherapy with atazanavir plus saquinavir in patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: A randomized comparative pilot trialAIDS20031791339134912799555 CohenCNieto-CisnerosLZalaCComparison of atazanavir with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with prior protease inhibitor failure: A randomized multinational trialCurr Med Res Opin200521101683169216238909 JohnsonMGrinsztejnBRodriguezCAtazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failuresAIDS200519768569415821394 WoodRPhanuphakPCahnPLong-term efficacy and safety of atazanavir with stavudine and lamivudine in patients previously treated with nelfinavir or atazanavirJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr200436268469215167287 NoorMFlintOMaaJParkerREffects of atazanavir/ ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir on glucose uptake and insulin sensitivity: Demonstrable differences in vitro and clinicallyAIDS200620141813182116954722 GatellJSalmon-CeronDLazzarinAEfficacy and safety of atazanavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with virologic suppression switched from a stable, boosted or unboosted protease inhibitor treatment regimen: The SWAN study (AI424–097) 48-week resultsClin Infect Dis200744111484149217479947 SorianoVGarcia-GascoPVispoEEfficacy and safety of replacing lopinavir with atazanavir in HIV-infected patients with undetectable plasma viraemia: Final results of the SLOAT trialJ Antimicrob Chemother200861120020517999977 MallolasJPodzamczerDDomingoPEfficacy and safety of switching from lopinavir/r (LPV/r) to atazanavir/r (ATV/r) in patients with virologic suppression receiving a LPV/r containing HAART: The ATAZIP study4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention2007 July 22–25Sydney, AustraliaAbstract WEPEB117LB. MoyleGGirardJAndradeJContinuation of BID boosted PI vs switch to once-daily ATV/RTV for the management of lipodystrophy: 48 week primary analysis of the 96 week multicenter, open-label, randomized, prospective ReAL studyXVII International AIDS Conference2008 August 3–8Mexico City, MexicoAbstract MOPDB103.