Figures & data
Table 1 Base assumptions for the three budget impact scenarios
Table 2 Diabetes-related complication costs derived from literature
Table 3 Cumulative diabetes complication rates derived from CitationUKPDS (1998) for the world with and without the new option (“Current treatment” vs “Current treatment & NEW option”). The complication rates are reported for the hypothetical diabetes cohort of 107,070 at year 0 (see assumptions)
Table 4 Market share for the three possible treatments over time for the three budget impact scenarios
Table 5 Yearly drug costs (€) for the three pharmaceutical treatment options on the market
Table 6 Budget Impact and premium differences for the three scenarios (base, best worse case) and for the corresponding (new option) cost groups for the incidence group 1000 patients per year. Budget Impact as well as premium differences are “Current Tx” vs “Current Tx & NEW”
Table 7 Budget Impact and premium differences for the three scenarios (base, best worse case) and for the corresponding (new option) cost groups for the incidence group 500 patients per year. Budget Impact as well as premium differences are “Current Tx” vs “Current Tx & NEW”
Table 8 Budget Impact and premium differences for the three scenarios (base, best worse case) and for the corresponding (new option) cost groups for the incidence group 2,000 patients per year. Budget Impact as well as premium differences are “Current Tx” vs “Current Tx & NEW”