1,837
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Urine Afamin and Afamin–Creatinine Ratio as Biomarkers for Kidney Injury

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1241-1249 | Received 21 Apr 2018, Accepted 31 Aug 2018, Published online: 15 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Table 1.  Clinical information of 376 participants.

Table 2.  The repeatability and within-laboratory precisions.

Figure 1.  The first-order model of four equally spaced concentrations in validation of linearity.

The solid line represents the linear model of four equally spaced concentration levels. Linear range of the method is 2.0–76.4 ng/ml. n = 3 per dilution level of the urine sample.

Figure 1.  The first-order model of four equally spaced concentrations in validation of linearity.The solid line represents the linear model of four equally spaced concentration levels. Linear range of the method is 2.0–76.4 ng/ml. n = 3 per dilution level of the urine sample.
Figure 2.  Distribution of urine afamin and afamin–creatinine ratio in healthy individuals according to sex groups.

Box and whisker plots demonstrated gender-specific distributions of uAFM (A) and AfCR (B) in 121 males and 126 females. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare differences between sex groups. The detail information was shown in Supplementary table 1.

*p < 0.05.

AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; uAFM: Urine afamin.

Figure 2.  Distribution of urine afamin and afamin–creatinine ratio in healthy individuals according to sex groups.Box and whisker plots demonstrated gender-specific distributions of uAFM (A) and AfCR (B) in 121 males and 126 females. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare differences between sex groups. The detail information was shown in Supplementary table 1.*p < 0.05.AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; uAFM: Urine afamin.

Table 3.  The relationship between afamin-related variables (urine afamin and afamin–creatinine ratio) and age in two sex groups.

Table 4.  The detail results of study participants in the clinical evaluation study†‡.

Figure 3.  Distribution of urine afamin and afamin–creatinine ratio in healthy volunteers and patients.

Box and whisker plots showed distribution of uAFM (A & C) and AfCR (B & D) in healthy volunteers (controls, n = 121 for males and 126 for females) compared with patients with PMN (n = 31 for males and 28 for females), IgAN (n = 22 for males and 24 for females) and MCD (n = 14 for males and 10 for females). Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare differences.

*p < 0.05.

ACR: Albumin-creatinine ratio; AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; IgAN: IgA nephropathy; MCD: Minimal change disease; PMN: Primary membranous nephropathy; uAFM: Urine afamin.

Figure 3.  Distribution of urine afamin and afamin–creatinine ratio in healthy volunteers and patients.Box and whisker plots showed distribution of uAFM (A & C) and AfCR (B & D) in healthy volunteers (controls, n = 121 for males and 126 for females) compared with patients with PMN (n = 31 for males and 28 for females), IgAN (n = 22 for males and 24 for females) and MCD (n = 14 for males and 10 for females). Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare differences.*p < 0.05.ACR: Albumin-creatinine ratio; AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; IgAN: IgA nephropathy; MCD: Minimal change disease; PMN: Primary membranous nephropathy; uAFM: Urine afamin.
Figure 4.  Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis of urine afamin, afamin–creatinine ratio, urine albumin and albumin–creatinine ratio in discriminating glomerulonephritis from healthy control.

ACR: Albumin–creatinine ratio; AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; AUC: Area under the curve; uAFM: Urine afamin; uALB: Urine albumin.

Figure 4.  Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis of urine afamin, afamin–creatinine ratio, urine albumin and albumin–creatinine ratio in discriminating glomerulonephritis from healthy control.ACR: Albumin–creatinine ratio; AfCR: Afamin–creatinine ratio; AUC: Area under the curve; uAFM: Urine afamin; uALB: Urine albumin.
Supplemental material

Additional File 1

Download PDF (27.9 KB)

Additional File 2

Download PDF (32.5 KB)

Additional File 3

Download PDF (32 KB)

Supplementary table 1. The differences of uAFM and AfCR between sex groups.

Download MS Word (56 KB)