1,606
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Novel Methylated DNA Markers Accurately Discriminate Lynch Syndrome Associated Colorectal Neoplasia

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2173-2187 | Received 02 Apr 2020, Accepted 26 Oct 2020, Published online: 22 Dec 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Patient and lesion characteristics for discovery and validation phases.

Table 2. Biological validation of methylated DNA marker candidates in independent colorectal tissues from Lynch syndrome and sporadic patients.

Figure 1. Box plot distributions of selected methylated DNA marker candidates in colorectal tissues from Lynch syndrome and sporadic patients from biological validation phase.

(A) MDMs showing similarly high neoplasm discrimination across Lynch syndrome and sporadic patients. (B) MDMs showing relatively higher neoplasm discrimination in Lynch syndrome patients. (C) MDMs showing relatively higher discrimination in sporadic patients.

A: Adenoma; C: Colorectal cancer; MDM: Methylated DNA marker; N: Normal.

Figure 1. Box plot distributions of selected methylated DNA marker candidates in colorectal tissues from Lynch syndrome and sporadic patients from biological validation phase. (A) MDMs showing similarly high neoplasm discrimination across Lynch syndrome and sporadic patients. (B) MDMs showing relatively higher neoplasm discrimination in Lynch syndrome patients. (C) MDMs showing relatively higher discrimination in sporadic patients.A: Adenoma; C: Colorectal cancer; MDM: Methylated DNA marker; N: Normal.
Figure 2. Heat matrices: methylation intensity of methylated DNA marker candidates in independent colorectal tissues from biological validation phase.

(A) Lynch syndrome and (B) sporadic tissues. Increasing intensity of yellow-red color spectrum in boxes indicates methylation strand counts in deciles above the 90th percentile values for the control groups (histologically normal mucosa) of each candidate methylated DNA marker (rows) in each tissue sample (columns). Black boxes indicate values falling below the 90th percentile in controls.

Figure 2. Heat matrices: methylation intensity of methylated DNA marker candidates in independent colorectal tissues from biological validation phase. (A) Lynch syndrome and (B) sporadic tissues. Increasing intensity of yellow-red color spectrum in boxes indicates methylation strand counts in deciles above the 90th percentile values for the control groups (histologically normal mucosa) of each candidate methylated DNA marker (rows) in each tissue sample (columns). Black boxes indicate values falling below the 90th percentile in controls.
Figure 3. Discrimination of selected methylated DNA marker candidates for colorectal neoplasia as assessed by receiver operator curves.

AUC in each graph are shown for OPLAH alone, a panel of novel methylated DNA markers without OPLAH (ARHGEF4, LRRC4, ANTXR1, PITX1) and the combination of BMP3 + NDRG4 with (A) Lynch adenomas, (B) Lynch cancers, (C) sporadic adenomas and (D) sporadic cancers.

AUC: Area under the curve.

Figure 3. Discrimination of selected methylated DNA marker candidates for colorectal neoplasia as assessed by receiver operator curves.AUC in each graph are shown for OPLAH alone, a panel of novel methylated DNA markers without OPLAH (ARHGEF4, LRRC4, ANTXR1, PITX1) and the combination of BMP3 + NDRG4 with (A) Lynch adenomas, (B) Lynch cancers, (C) sporadic adenomas and (D) sporadic cancers.AUC: Area under the curve.

Table 3. Functions of genes methylated in Lynch syndrome colorectal cancers.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (282.9 KB)