Figures & data
Table 1.
Types of CRISPR systems that have been repurposed for epigenome editing.
Table 2.
dCas9-mediated epigenome editing involves multiple epigenetic mechanisms.
Table 3.
Applications of CRISPR mediated epigenome editing in cancer research and regenerative medicine.
Konermann S
, LotfyP , BrideauNJ , OkiJ , ShokhirevMN , HsuPD. Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell173(3), 665–676.e614 (2018).
Nunez JK
, ChenJ , PommierGCet al. Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing. Cell184(9), 2503–2519.e2517 (2021).
Hilton IB
, D’IppolitoAM , VockleyCMet al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat. Biotechnol.33(5), 510–517 (2015).
Vojta A
, DobrinicP , TadicVet al. Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res.44(12), 5615–5628 (2016).
Pflueger C
, TanD , SwainTet al. A modular dCas9-SunTag DNMT3A epigenome editing system overcomes pervasive off-target activity of direct fusion dCas9-DNMT3A constructs. Genome Res.28(8), 1193–1206 (2018).
Sapozhnikov DM
, SzyfM. Unraveling the functional role of DNA demethylation at specific promoters by targeted steric blockage of DNA methyltransferase with CRISPR/dCas9. Nat. Commun.12(1), 5711 (2021).
Josipovic G
, TadicV , KlasicMet al. Antagonistic and synergistic epigenetic modulation using orthologous CRISPR/dCas9-based modular system. Nucleic Acids Res.47(18), 9637–9657 (2019).
Nguyen TV
, ListerR. Genomic targeting of TET activity for targeted demethylation using CRISPR/Cas9. Methods Mol. Biol.2272, 181–194 (2021).
Kwon DY
, ZhaoYT , LamonicaJM , ZhouZ. Locus-specific histone deacetylation using a synthetic CRISPR-Cas9-based HDAC. Nat. Commun.8, 15315 (2017).
Kearns NA
, PhamH , TabakBet al. Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion. Nat. Methods12(5), 401–403 (2015).
Zhao W
, XuY , WangYet al. Investigating crosstalk between H3K27 acetylation and H3K4 trimethylation in CRISPR/dCas-based epigenome editing and gene activation. Sci. Rep.11(1), 15912 (2021).
Cano-Rodriguez D
, GjaltemaRA , JilderdaLJet al. Writing of H3K4Me3 overcomes epigenetic silencing in a sustained but context-dependent manner. Nat. Commun.7, 12284 (2016).
O’Geen H
, RenC , NicoletCMet al. dCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression. Nucleic Acids Res.45(17), 9901–9916 (2017).
Thakore PI
, D’IppolitoAM , SongLet al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat. Methods12(12), 1143–1149 (2015).
Chen X
, WeiM , LiuXet al. Construction and validation of the CRISPR/dCas9-EZH2 system for targeted H3K27Me3 modification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.511(2), 246–252 (2019).
Fukushima HS
, TakedaH , NakamuraR. Targeted in vivo epigenome editing of H3K27me3. Epigenetics Chromatin12(1), 17 (2019).
Aparicio-Prat E
, ArnanC , SalaI , BoschN , GuigoR , JohnsonR. DECKO: single-oligo, dual-CRISPR deletion of genomic elements including long non-coding RNAs. BMC Genomics16, 846 (2015).
Shariati SA
, DominguezA , XieS , WernigM , QiLS , SkotheimJM. Reversible disruption of specific transcription factor-DNA interactions using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol. Cell.74(3), 622–633.e624 (2019).
Liu XS
, WuH , JiXet al. Editing DNA methylation in the mammalian genome. Cell167(1), 233–247.e217 (2016).
Morgan SL
, MarianoNC , BermudezAet al. Manipulation of nuclear architecture through CRISPR-mediated chromosomal looping. Nat. Commun.8, 15993 (2017).
Kim JH
, RegeM , ValeriJet al. LADL: light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control. Nat. Methods16(7), 633–639 (2019).
Wang H
, GuoR , DuZet al. Epigenetic targeting of granulin in hepatoma cells by synthetic CRISPR dCas9 Epi-suppressors. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids11, 23–33 (2018).