1,109
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific clinical oncology trial designs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1741-1752 | Received 30 Sep 2022, Accepted 03 May 2023, Published online: 07 Jun 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Tumor-specific trials and cohorts included in final analysis.

L1: Level 1; L2: Level 2.

Figure 1. Tumor-specific trials and cohorts included in final analysis.L1: Level 1; L2: Level 2.
Figure 2. Tumor-agnostic trials and cohorts included in final analysis.

L1: Level 1; L2: Level 2; ORR: Objective response rate.

Figure 2. Tumor-agnostic trials and cohorts included in final analysis.L1: Level 1; L2: Level 2; ORR: Objective response rate.
Figure 3. Pooled objective response rates for thyroid cancer.

df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.

Figure 3. Pooled objective response rates for thyroid cancer.df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.
Figure 4. Pooled objective response rates for non-small-cell lung cancer.

df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.

Figure 4. Pooled objective response rates for non-small-cell lung cancer.df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.
Figure 5. Pooled objective response rates for melanoma.

df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.

Figure 5. Pooled objective response rates for melanoma.df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.
Figure 6. Pooled objective response rates, stratified by intervention type.

df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.

Figure 6. Pooled objective response rates, stratified by intervention type.df: Degree of freedom; GLMM: Generalized linear mixed model.
Supplemental material

Supplementary Table 1

Download MS Word (471.2 KB)