Figures & data
Figure 1. Temperature of a cell pellet by induction heating. Cell pellets filling the intercellular space with five different concentrations of ferucarbotran were applied for an AMF. The equilibrium temperatures; 38.3°, 46.5°, 51.6°, 64.3°, and 69.7°C were obtained for the five different concentrations of 20♦, 27▾, 40▴, 60•, and 80▪ mg γ-Fe2O3/mL initial ferucarbotran concentration, respectively (A). The value between the equilibrium temperature and applied heat dose was plotted for three different cancer cell lines (SUIT-2▪, BxPC-3•, and AsPC-1▴) (B). Heat dose of 0.7, 1.5, 2.1, 7.3, and 9.5 W/gtumour, resulted in equilibrium temperatures of 38.3°, 46.5°, 51.6°, 64.3°, and 69.7°C, respectively.
![Figure 1. Temperature of a cell pellet by induction heating. Cell pellets filling the intercellular space with five different concentrations of ferucarbotran were applied for an AMF. The equilibrium temperatures; 38.3°, 46.5°, 51.6°, 64.3°, and 69.7°C were obtained for the five different concentrations of 20♦, 27▾, 40▴, 60•, and 80▪ mg γ-Fe2O3/mL initial ferucarbotran concentration, respectively (A). The value between the equilibrium temperature and applied heat dose was plotted for three different cancer cell lines (SUIT-2▪, BxPC-3•, and AsPC-1▴) (B). Heat dose of 0.7, 1.5, 2.1, 7.3, and 9.5 W/gtumour, resulted in equilibrium temperatures of 38.3°, 46.5°, 51.6°, 64.3°, and 69.7°C, respectively.](/cms/asset/5aa31a32-2620-41c2-a11f-2cc861f1e6b9/ihyt_a_468624_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Computer simulation of thermal gradient in a small in vitro cell pellet surrounded by air. Thermal gradients of the 20 µL cell pellet, which was heated with five different heat doses (0.7, 1.5, 2.1, 7.3, and 9.5 W/gtumour) for 300 s are shown (A). The time-dependent change in the temperature at the centre (B) and periphery of pellet (C). Equilibrium temperatures at the centre of the tumour on administration of the above-mentioned heat doses were 38.9°, 43.4°, 51.4°, 62.7°, and 73.3°C, respectively. Those at the periphery were 36.0°, 39.5°, 45.7°, 54.5°, and 62.5°C, respectively.
![Figure 2. Computer simulation of thermal gradient in a small in vitro cell pellet surrounded by air. Thermal gradients of the 20 µL cell pellet, which was heated with five different heat doses (0.7, 1.5, 2.1, 7.3, and 9.5 W/gtumour) for 300 s are shown (A). The time-dependent change in the temperature at the centre (B) and periphery of pellet (C). Equilibrium temperatures at the centre of the tumour on administration of the above-mentioned heat doses were 38.9°, 43.4°, 51.4°, 62.7°, and 73.3°C, respectively. Those at the periphery were 36.0°, 39.5°, 45.7°, 54.5°, and 62.5°C, respectively.](/cms/asset/a770ab94-6b0d-4c28-b8e1-76b705b56c71/ihyt_a_468624_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Cytotoxic effect of heat, generated by induction heating. An AMF (100–150 Oe, 114 kHz) was applied to three different cell pellets (SUIT-2, BxPC-3, and AsPC-1) containing ferucarbotran. After 10-min exposure to various temperatures (39°C, 42°C, 46°C, 48°C, 51°C, and 60–65°C), each cell pellet was cultured for 7 days. The numbers of viable cells 1, 3, and 7 days after incubation were counted. The values and bars are the mean and SD of three independent experiments.
![Figure 3. Cytotoxic effect of heat, generated by induction heating. An AMF (100–150 Oe, 114 kHz) was applied to three different cell pellets (SUIT-2, BxPC-3, and AsPC-1) containing ferucarbotran. After 10-min exposure to various temperatures (39°C, 42°C, 46°C, 48°C, 51°C, and 60–65°C), each cell pellet was cultured for 7 days. The numbers of viable cells 1, 3, and 7 days after incubation were counted. The values and bars are the mean and SD of three independent experiments.](/cms/asset/d5d87001-bfd5-41c4-be38-187b7491326b/ihyt_a_468624_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Computer simulation of the thermal gradient in in vivo liver tumour of different sizes. The temperature changes in the 10 mm (A, C) and 5 mm tumours (B, D) with a heat dose of 1.7 W/gtumour for 300 s were simulated. Images of the entire liver and an enlarged image of a part of the tumours (A, B). Time-dependent change in the temperatures at the centre and periphery of the 10 mm (C) and 5 mm (D) tumours. In the simulation of the 10-mm-diameter tumour, the centre and periphery of the 10-mm tumour were heated to 61°C and 50°C, respectively, however, those of the 5-mm tumour were heated only to 44°C and 41°C, respectively.
![Figure 4. Computer simulation of the thermal gradient in in vivo liver tumour of different sizes. The temperature changes in the 10 mm (A, C) and 5 mm tumours (B, D) with a heat dose of 1.7 W/gtumour for 300 s were simulated. Images of the entire liver and an enlarged image of a part of the tumours (A, B). Time-dependent change in the temperatures at the centre and periphery of the 10 mm (C) and 5 mm (D) tumours. In the simulation of the 10-mm-diameter tumour, the centre and periphery of the 10-mm tumour were heated to 61°C and 50°C, respectively, however, those of the 5-mm tumour were heated only to 44°C and 41°C, respectively.](/cms/asset/3908b815-c06b-45de-9d7f-ca4230acf76b/ihyt_a_468624_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. Required heat dose for liver tumours with various diameters. The relationship between the tumour size and the heat dose administered for 300 s to heat the tumours to 42°C (▴), 46°C (•), and 50°C (▪) at their periphery was simulated. In order to increase the temperature of the tumour periphery up to 50°C, tumours with diameters 40, 20, 10, 5, and 1 mm require heat doses of 0.6, 0.7, 1.7, 5.1, and 105 W/gtumour, respectively.
![Figure 5. Required heat dose for liver tumours with various diameters. The relationship between the tumour size and the heat dose administered for 300 s to heat the tumours to 42°C (▴), 46°C (•), and 50°C (▪) at their periphery was simulated. In order to increase the temperature of the tumour periphery up to 50°C, tumours with diameters 40, 20, 10, 5, and 1 mm require heat doses of 0.6, 0.7, 1.7, 5.1, and 105 W/gtumour, respectively.](/cms/asset/8f0786a4-859a-45e0-a6f9-f37179c35008/ihyt_a_468624_f0005_b.gif)