516
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Thermal distribution of microwave antenna for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

, &
Pages 582-589 | Received 15 Aug 2012, Accepted 06 May 2013, Published online: 05 Jul 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Antenna configuration and antenna-myocardium-blood numerical models (A) Antenna configuration (mm), (B) Perpendicular to the myocardium surface (90°), and (C) Parallel to the myocardium surface (0°).

Figure 1. Antenna configuration and antenna-myocardium-blood numerical models (A) Antenna configuration (mm), (B) Perpendicular to the myocardium surface (90°), and (C) Parallel to the myocardium surface (0°).

Table I. Dielectric parameters used in antenna model.

Table II. Dielectric and thermal parameters used in the numerical simulation.

Table III. Convective heat transfer coefficient in different applied locations.

Figure 2. Effect of thermal cooling at the endocardium (A) Antenna temperature, (B) 1417 W/(m2·°C), (C) No blood flow exists, (D) Antenna temperature, (E) 1417 W/(m2·°C), and (F) No blood flow exists.

Figure 2. Effect of thermal cooling at the endocardium (A) Antenna temperature, (B) 1417 W/(m2·°C), (C) No blood flow exists, (D) Antenna temperature, (E) 1417 W/(m2·°C), and (F) No blood flow exists.

Figure 3. Thermal distributions with different convective heat transfer coefficient (30 W, 40 s).,(A) 1,417 W/(m2·°C), (B) 3,550 W/(m2·°C), and (C) 7,100 W/(m2·°C).

Figure 3. Thermal distributions with different convective heat transfer coefficient (30 W, 40 s).,(A) 1,417 W/(m2·°C), (B) 3,550 W/(m2·°C), and (C) 7,100 W/(m2·°C).

Figure 4. Lesion area with increasing time (P = 30 W) (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Figure 4. Lesion area with increasing time (P = 30 W) (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Figure 5. Top view of lesion area.

Figure 5. Top view of lesion area.

Figure 6. Width changes with increasing heating time (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Figure 6. Width changes with increasing heating time (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Figure 7. Depth changes with increasing heating time (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Figure 7. Depth changes with increasing heating time (A) Perpendicular to the endocardium and (B) Parallel to the endocardium.

Table IV. Applied power and ablation time with different requiring lesion depth.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.