1,153
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatic malignancy adjacent to the gallbladder

, , , &
Pages 579-587 | Received 25 Aug 2014, Accepted 30 Jan 2015, Published online: 22 Jun 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Comparison of clinical data in the study and control groups.

Figure 1. The MW antenna (long arrow) was placed into the tumour and thermal monitoring needle (short arrow) was placed into the tumour margin proximal to the gallbladder (GB) for real-time temperature monitoring during the MW ablation.

Figure 1. The MW antenna (long arrow) was placed into the tumour and thermal monitoring needle (short arrow) was placed into the tumour margin proximal to the gallbladder (GB) for real-time temperature monitoring during the MW ablation.

Figure 2. The curves of temperature monitoring during MW ablation for a tumour adjacent to the gallbladder. The temperature of marginal tumour tissue adjacent to the gallbladder was monitored and controlled to fluctuating between 45 and 54 °C during the whole treatment procedure.

Figure 2. The curves of temperature monitoring during MW ablation for a tumour adjacent to the gallbladder. The temperature of marginal tumour tissue adjacent to the gallbladder was monitored and controlled to fluctuating between 45 and 54 °C during the whole treatment procedure.

Figure 3. A 68-year-old man treated with MW ablation for HCC adjacent to the gallbladder. (A) Before ablation the tumour (arrowhead) is seen in MRI scans. (B) Six months after ablation, the ablation zone (arrowhead) has no arterial enhancing in CT scans (left) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (right). (C) MRI scans (left) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (right) from 1-year follow up show the ablation zone (arrowhead) had no local tumour progression.

Figure 3. A 68-year-old man treated with MW ablation for HCC adjacent to the gallbladder. (A) Before ablation the tumour (arrowhead) is seen in MRI scans. (B) Six months after ablation, the ablation zone (arrowhead) has no arterial enhancing in CT scans (left) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (right). (C) MRI scans (left) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (right) from 1-year follow up show the ablation zone (arrowhead) had no local tumour progression.

Table 2. Comparison of therapeutic data in the study and control groups.

Table 3. Complications after MW ablation between the study group and control groups.

Table 4. Comparison of the maximum diameter and number of sessions in the completely ablated lesions and local tumour progression lesions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.