540
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A randomized practical behavioural trial of curriculum-based advocacy training for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their families

, , , , &
Pages 1530-1538 | Received 25 Mar 2015, Accepted 18 Jul 2015, Published online: 21 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Primary objective: To test whether a curriculum-based advocacy training programme improves advocacy behaviour when compared to a matched group engaged in self-directed advocacy activities.

Research design: Community-based randomized practical behavioural trial.

Methods and procedures: Adults with moderate–severe TBI 1 or more years post-injury and their family members were recruited in Minnesota (4 years), Iowa and Wisconsin (each 3 years) and randomized into a curriculum-based or self-directed advocacy training group. Both groups met on the same day, at separate locations in the same city, once per month for 4 consecutive months.

Main outcomes and results: Pre–post written and video testimony were rated using the Advocacy Behaviour Rating Scale (ABRS). Mean ABRS scores increased after intervention in both groups (curriculum n = 129, self-directed n = 128), but there was no significant difference in this increase between groups. When groups were combined, a significant pre–post improvement in mean ABRS scores was observed.

Conclusions: Curriculum-based advocacy training was not superior to a self-directed approach in improving ABRS scores. A significant improvement in expression of an advocacy message was observed when intervention groups were combined. These findings suggest that bringing together like-minded motivated individuals is more important than programme structure or content in changing advocacy behaviour.

Acknowledgements

The authors are most grateful to David King, Jeff Nachbar and Michelle Gray of the Minnesota Brain Injury Alliance; Geoffrey Lauer, Natasha Retz, Brandi Jensen and Maggie Ferguson of the Brain Injury Alliance of IA; and Mark Warhus of the Brain Injury Alliance of WI for their dedication to this trial, without whom it could not have been completed.

Declaration of interest

No competing financial interests exist for any author. This study was funded by the Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic TBI Model System Center Grant H133A070013.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.