Figures & data
Figure 1. Flow chart of the included children, visits, and tympanometric and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations.
![Figure 1. Flow chart of the included children, visits, and tympanometric and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations.](/cms/asset/c6dfb6c1-5573-419f-b7b9-9b2e7aa8a4d5/ipri_a_1118835_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1. Successful tympanometric examinations (n = 670) performed by the nurses.
Table 2. Predictive values (with respective 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for the diagnostic test results with tympanometry (n = 670) and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) (n = 782) obtained by the nursesTable Footnote1.
Table 3. Successful spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations (n = 782) performed by the nurses.
Figure 2. Exclusion of acute otitis media (AOM) based on tympanometry performed by the nurses at symptomatic visits (n = 459). Type A and C1 tympanograms from both ears of the child were regarded as the exclusive test result for AOM.
Notes: aClassification of tympanograms. Type A (tympanometric peak pressure greater than –100 daPa); type C1 (the pressure between –100 and –199 daPa); type C2 (pressure –200 daPa or less); type Cs (width >300 daPa or static acoustic admittance <0.2 mmho); and type B (flat).
![Figure 2. Exclusion of acute otitis media (AOM) based on tympanometry performed by the nurses at symptomatic visits (n = 459). Type A and C1 tympanograms from both ears of the child were regarded as the exclusive test result for AOM.Notes: aClassification of tympanograms. Type A (tympanometric peak pressure greater than –100 daPa); type C1 (the pressure between –100 and –199 daPa); type C2 (pressure –200 daPa or less); type Cs (width >300 daPa or static acoustic admittance <0.2 mmho); and type B (flat).](/cms/asset/dba74353-011d-4294-a35e-5f36bcab344b/ipri_a_1118835_f0002_b.jpg)