Figures & data
Table I. Baseline patient and treatment variables.
Figure 1. Manual contours throughout a course of follow-up for a patient whose cancer recurred. The solid lines represent consolidative changes, and the dashed lines represent ground glass opacity (GGO).
![Figure 1. Manual contours throughout a course of follow-up for a patient whose cancer recurred. The solid lines represent consolidative changes, and the dashed lines represent ground glass opacity (GGO).](/cms/asset/deea17ae-1622-40c8-9dce-8e83e7916a95/ionc_a_731525_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. The standard deviation (SD) of CT density was used as a basic texture measure. Three examples from ground glass opacity of patients in this study, showing the differences in texture with the varying SDs: a) 50.1 HU, b) 85.8 HU, c) 123.4 HU.
![Figure 2. The standard deviation (SD) of CT density was used as a basic texture measure. Three examples from ground glass opacity of patients in this study, showing the differences in texture with the varying SDs: a) 50.1 HU, b) 85.8 HU, c) 123.4 HU.](/cms/asset/f58c276c-b488-47a0-9672-9a9cee17ed7b/ionc_a_731525_f0002_b.gif)
Table II. Baseline pre-treatment imaging characteristics.
Figure 3. Cumulative size measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; all values are the mean ± 95% CI. a) RECIST and b) 3D volume. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.
![Figure 3. Cumulative size measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; all values are the mean ± 95% CI. a) RECIST and b) 3D volume. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.](/cms/asset/f9c5de4c-e383-4e0e-803b-c0e4b2bde148/ionc_a_731525_f0003_b.jpg)