2,962
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Distinguishing radiation fibrosis from tumour recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer: A quantitative analysis of CT density changes

, , , &
Pages 910-918 | Received 04 Jul 2012, Accepted 10 Sep 2012, Published online: 29 Oct 2012

Figures & data

Table I. Baseline patient and treatment variables.

Figure 1. Manual contours throughout a course of follow-up for a patient whose cancer recurred. The solid lines represent consolidative changes, and the dashed lines represent ground glass opacity (GGO).

Figure 1. Manual contours throughout a course of follow-up for a patient whose cancer recurred. The solid lines represent consolidative changes, and the dashed lines represent ground glass opacity (GGO).

Figure 2. The standard deviation (SD) of CT density was used as a basic texture measure. Three examples from ground glass opacity of patients in this study, showing the differences in texture with the varying SDs: a) 50.1 HU, b) 85.8 HU, c) 123.4 HU.

Figure 2. The standard deviation (SD) of CT density was used as a basic texture measure. Three examples from ground glass opacity of patients in this study, showing the differences in texture with the varying SDs: a) 50.1 HU, b) 85.8 HU, c) 123.4 HU.

Table II. Baseline pre-treatment imaging characteristics.

Figure 3. Cumulative size measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; all values are the mean ± 95% CI. a) RECIST and b) 3D volume. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 3. Cumulative size measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; all values are the mean ± 95% CI. a) RECIST and b) 3D volume. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 4. Cumulative appearance measures of the ground glass opacity regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; a) Mean (± 95% CI) CT density, and b) standard deviation (± 95% CI) of CT density. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 4. Cumulative appearance measures of the ground glass opacity regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; a) Mean (± 95% CI) CT density, and b) standard deviation (± 95% CI) of CT density. *Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 5. Cumulative appearance measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; a) Mean (± 95% CI) CT density, and b) standard deviation (± 95% CI) of CT density. Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.

Figure 5. Cumulative appearance measures of the consolidative regions throughout follow-up post-SABR; a) Mean (± 95% CI) CT density, and b) standard deviation (± 95% CI) of CT density. Indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.
Supplemental material

Supplementary Appendix 1

Download PDF (646 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.