Figures & data
Figure 1. Lexis diagrams illustrating the methods used to combine data from the cohort and period approaches to produce a fictitious cohort on which differentiated prevalence was estimated. (a) Illustration of cohort (ABCD) and period (EDWV) approaches; (b) Construction of fictitious cohort (ABXY) combining data from the cohort and period approaches; (c) Estimation of differentiated prevalence from fictitious cohort.
![Figure 1. Lexis diagrams illustrating the methods used to combine data from the cohort and period approaches to produce a fictitious cohort on which differentiated prevalence was estimated. (a) Illustration of cohort (ABCD) and period (EDWV) approaches; (b) Construction of fictitious cohort (ABXY) combining data from the cohort and period approaches; (c) Estimation of differentiated prevalence from fictitious cohort.](/cms/asset/45cb1cdb-0b46-4cac-9f00-687f9e63c82f/ionc_a_743679_f0001_b.gif)
Table I. Health status distribution of colon and rectal cancer cases collected for the period approach. All ages and both sexes.
Table IIa. Colon cancer: Health status distribution of fictitious cohort by each annual intervals. All ages, both sexes.
Table IIb. Rectal cancer: Health status distribution of fictitious cohort by each annual intervals. All ages, both sexes.
Table IIIa. Colon cancer: Health status distribution of fictitious cohort at 10th year after diagnosis for each interval (j,10). All ages, both sexes.
Table IIIb. Rectal cancer: Health status distribution of fictitious cohort at 10th year after diagnosis by each interval (j,10). All ages, both sexes.
Table IV. Ten-year differentiated prevalence estimates for colon and rectal cancer, by sex and age at end of follow-up.