Figures & data
Figure 1. Variations in CTV dose parameters with shifting the iso-center by 2 mm in different directions. In the upper panel the percentage of the CTV volume receiving dose of ≥ 95% of the prescribed dose is shown. The dose received by 98% of the CTV volume, and the dose percentage received by the hottest 2% of the CTV volumes are presented in the middle panel. In the lower panel the CTV generalized equivalent uniform dose for each simulated situation is shown.
![Figure 1. Variations in CTV dose parameters with shifting the iso-center by 2 mm in different directions. In the upper panel the percentage of the CTV volume receiving dose of ≥ 95% of the prescribed dose is shown. The dose received by 98% of the CTV volume, and the dose percentage received by the hottest 2% of the CTV volumes are presented in the middle panel. In the lower panel the CTV generalized equivalent uniform dose for each simulated situation is shown.](/cms/asset/9b4c9592-06f9-4a30-ab18-1d8a61ec90cf/ionc_a_812793_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Variations in some CTV dose parameters with preceding treatment time shown at different time points 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy for all patients.
![Figure 2. Variations in some CTV dose parameters with preceding treatment time shown at different time points 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy for all patients.](/cms/asset/6869ba52-a087-4a51-991f-09ad942adc8d/ionc_a_812793_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Variations in the mean dose (DMean), (gEUD) and (V40 Gy) received by the CL vocal cord with iso-centers shifts of 2 mm in the specified directions.
![Figure 3. Variations in the mean dose (DMean), (gEUD) and (V40 Gy) received by the CL vocal cord with iso-centers shifts of 2 mm in the specified directions.](/cms/asset/70f83fac-99a5-4f10-a091-6d604830d0c1/ionc_a_812793_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Variations in the mean dose (DMean), (gEUD) and (V40 Gy) received by the CL vocal cord with preceding treatment time shown at different time points 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy for all patients.
![Figure 4. Variations in the mean dose (DMean), (gEUD) and (V40 Gy) received by the CL vocal cord with preceding treatment time shown at different time points 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy for all patients.](/cms/asset/1a300a8a-719f-4793-9601-b11125630bad/ionc_a_812793_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Upper panel: For each patient, the airgap area between the vocal cords, averaged over the various breathing phases (various axial CT-slices), as a function of delivered dose is presented. The lines are results of regression analyses, with on average, a statistically significant negative slope (see text). Lower panel: axial CT slices for patient 2 at the level of the iso-center (indicated by a red +) for doses 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy.
![Figure 5. Upper panel: For each patient, the airgap area between the vocal cords, averaged over the various breathing phases (various axial CT-slices), as a function of delivered dose is presented. The lines are results of regression analyses, with on average, a statistically significant negative slope (see text). Lower panel: axial CT slices for patient 2 at the level of the iso-center (indicated by a red +) for doses 0 Gy, 22 Gy, 44 Gy, and 66 Gy.](/cms/asset/05a9a3d1-7451-4af3-94e2-db52e1722950/ionc_a_812793_f0005_b.jpg)