4,119
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Radiotherapy

Towards individualized dose constraints: Adjusting the QUANTEC radiation pneumonitis model for clinical risk factors

, , , &
Pages 605-612 | Received 16 Jan 2013, Accepted 17 Jun 2013, Published online: 19 Aug 2013

Figures & data

Table I. Odds ratios for the effects of clinical risk factors.

Table II. Summary of prevalence of clinical risk factors in the QUANTEC analysis.

Figure 1. Relationships between the mean dose to the lungs and the risk of radiation pneumonitis. Solid line: Dose-response reported in the QUANTEC study [Citation1]. Dashed line: Estimated dose-response for a patient currently smoking, with no risk factors (no pulmonary co-morbidities, no lower/middle tumor, below 63 years old, and no sequential chemotherapy). Dotted line: Estimated dose-response for patients with highest risk (pulmonary co-morbidities, middle or lower tumor location, no history of smoking, above 63 years of age, and sequential chemotherapy). Appropriate constraints on the mean lung dose in order to ensure a < 20% complication rate are marked on the primary axis.

Figure 1. Relationships between the mean dose to the lungs and the risk of radiation pneumonitis. Solid line: Dose-response reported in the QUANTEC study [Citation1]. Dashed line: Estimated dose-response for a patient currently smoking, with no risk factors (no pulmonary co-morbidities, no lower/middle tumor, below 63 years old, and no sequential chemotherapy). Dotted line: Estimated dose-response for patients with highest risk (pulmonary co-morbidities, middle or lower tumor location, no history of smoking, above 63 years of age, and sequential chemotherapy). Appropriate constraints on the mean lung dose in order to ensure a < 20% complication rate are marked on the primary axis.

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence functions for competing outcomes for patients in the validation cohort. Solid line: Radiation pneumonitis CTCAE v. 3.0 grade 3 or above. Dashed line: Local progression of lung cancer. Dotted line: Death from lung cancer. Dot-dashed line: Death from other (or unknown) cause.

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence functions for competing outcomes for patients in the validation cohort. Solid line: Radiation pneumonitis CTCAE v. 3.0 grade 3 or above. Dashed line: Local progression of lung cancer. Dotted line: Death from lung cancer. Dot-dashed line: Death from other (or unknown) cause.

Table III. Patient characteristics in validation cohort.

Table IV. Crude incidence of radiation pneumonitis (as first event) in validation cohort.

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of radiation pneumonitis for high/low risk patients in the validation cohort: Subdistribution cumulative incidence functions for radiation pneumonitis CTCEA v. 3.0 grade 3 or above. Solid line: Patients with predicted normal tissue toxicity (NTCP) below or equal to the group median (low-risk patients). Dashed line: Patients with NTCP above the group median (high-risk patients). Shaded areas: 95% confidence intervals. a) NTCP calculated using the dose-only relationship from the QUANTEC analysis [Citation1]. Group median: 17.0%. b) NTCP calculated using the individualized risk estimate, with the QUANTEC model adjusted for the effects of clinical risk factors. Group median: 13.4%.

Figure 3. Cumulative incidence of radiation pneumonitis for high/low risk patients in the validation cohort: Subdistribution cumulative incidence functions for radiation pneumonitis CTCEA v. 3.0 grade 3 or above. Solid line: Patients with predicted normal tissue toxicity (NTCP) below or equal to the group median (low-risk patients). Dashed line: Patients with NTCP above the group median (high-risk patients). Shaded areas: 95% confidence intervals. a) NTCP calculated using the dose-only relationship from the QUANTEC analysis [Citation1]. Group median: 17.0%. b) NTCP calculated using the individualized risk estimate, with the QUANTEC model adjusted for the effects of clinical risk factors. Group median: 13.4%.
Supplemental material

http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0284186X.2013.820341

Download PDF (622.9 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.