1,220
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparison of end-expiratory respiratory gating methods for PET/CT

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1079-1085 | Received 22 Apr 2014, Accepted 14 May 2014, Published online: 24 Jun 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. Box-plot of the fraction of counts saved in the PET/CT patient study by each method. Whiskers define the maximum and minimum value of the counts saved, while the horizontal line defines the median of the counts saved.

Figure 1. Box-plot of the fraction of counts saved in the PET/CT patient study by each method. Whiskers define the maximum and minimum value of the counts saved, while the horizontal line defines the median of the counts saved.

Figure 2. Example case of a patient, showing a clear increase in SUVmax and SUV mean with reduction of lesion volume.

Figure 2. Example case of a patient, showing a clear increase in SUVmax and SUV mean with reduction of lesion volume.

Table I. Measured SUVmax and SUVmean values with each gating method.

Supplemental material

Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Table I

Download PDF (702.6 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.