2,105
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dose or ‘LET’ painting – What is optimal in particle therapy of hypoxic tumors?

&
Pages 1614-1622 | Received 22 May 2015, Accepted 09 Jun 2015, Published online: 22 Jul 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), as appearing using the model parameters in the current work.

Figure 1. Oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), as appearing using the model parameters in the current work.

Figure 2. (A) Map of the partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) in a single slice of the tumor prior to the first treatment fraction (upper). Corresponding maps of the optimal dose and LET distribution are also given (middle and lower, respectively). The dose and LET range is indicated by the color bar with a linear and logarithmic scale, respectively. (B) Histograms of the full dose and LET distributions in the tumor in the case of dose- and LET painting, respectively.

Figure 2. (A) Map of the partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) in a single slice of the tumor prior to the first treatment fraction (upper). Corresponding maps of the optimal dose and LET distribution are also given (middle and lower, respectively). The dose and LET range is indicated by the color bar with a linear and logarithmic scale, respectively. (B) Histograms of the full dose and LET distributions in the tumor in the case of dose- and LET painting, respectively.

Figure 3. Tumor control probability (TCP) as a function of mean tumor dose for the three ions species considered.Four strategies were considered: 1. combined dose and LET painting (DP, LP), 2. dose painting only (DP, no LP), 3. LET painting only (no DP, LP) and 4. conventional radiotherapy (no DP, no LP).

Figure 3. Tumor control probability (TCP) as a function of mean tumor dose for the three ions species considered.Four strategies were considered: 1. combined dose and LET painting (DP, LP), 2. dose painting only (DP, no LP), 3. LET painting only (no DP, LP) and 4. conventional radiotherapy (no DP, no LP).

Table I. The therapeutic gain from dose-and/or LET painting, expressed in terms of the dose giving 50% TCP for a conventional treatment relative to the iso-effective dose for painting. In the case of painting, full adaption to day-to-day variations in tumor hypoxia were followed.

Table II. The therapeutic gain from replanning of combined dose- and LET painting, expressed in terms of the dose giving 50% cure for a conventional treatment relative to the iso-effective dose for painting.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.