Figures & data
Figure 1. Study disposition. (AE = adverse event; CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo; PP = per protocol.) Hochberg et al, Curr Med Res Opin, 2011; 27: 1243-53, copyright © 2011, Informa Healthcare. Reproduced with permission of Informa Healthcare.
![Figure 1. Study disposition. (AE = adverse event; CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo; PP = per protocol.) Hochberg et al, Curr Med Res Opin, 2011; 27: 1243-53, copyright © 2011, Informa Healthcare. Reproduced with permission of Informa Healthcare.](/cms/asset/f524676e-4105-4797-9f1c-6e1d888b63ab/iann_a_625971_f0001_b.gif)
Table I. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.
Figure 2. Change from baseline to week 12 in mSODA pain scores (LS mean) in patients treated with naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium, celecoxib, and placebo (mITT population with last observation carried forward). 95% CI on treatment difference for naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium minus celecoxib in Study 307: −0.4, 1.9; P = 0.1828; and for Study 309: −1.8, 0.6; P = 0.2979. (CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; LS = least squares; mSODA = modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo.)
![Figure 2. Change from baseline to week 12 in mSODA pain scores (LS mean) in patients treated with naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium, celecoxib, and placebo (mITT population with last observation carried forward). 95% CI on treatment difference for naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium minus celecoxib in Study 307: −0.4, 1.9; P = 0.1828; and for Study 309: −1.8, 0.6; P = 0.2979. (CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; LS = least squares; mSODA = modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo.)](/cms/asset/9cfcab0a-8fae-40c5-827a-045e030bb8ca/iann_a_625971_f0002_b.gif)
Table II. Mean change from baseline to week 6 and week 12 in mSODA pain scores in LDA users and non-users (mITT population).
Figure 3. Proportion of heartburn-free days (LS mean %) from baseline to week 12 in patients treated with naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium, celecoxib, and placebo (mITT population). 95% CI on treatment difference for naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium minus celecoxib in Study 307: −2.1, 12.7; and for Study 309: 2.5, 13.4. (CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; LS = least squares; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo.)
![Figure 3. Proportion of heartburn-free days (LS mean %) from baseline to week 12 in patients treated with naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium, celecoxib, and placebo (mITT population). 95% CI on treatment difference for naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium minus celecoxib in Study 307: −2.1, 12.7; and for Study 309: 2.5, 13.4. (CEL = celecoxib; mITT = modified intent-to-treat; LS = least squares; NAP/ESO = naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium; PBO = placebo.)](/cms/asset/e8be5e4d-83a8-4b1e-bd6b-769b9dd07f4e/iann_a_625971_f0003_b.gif)
Table III. Summary of predefined UGI AEs and discontinuations as a result of UGI AEs or any AE (safety population).
Table IV. Treatment-emergent AEs: Overall and reported by ≥ 3% of patients in any treatment group of either study (safety population).