1,770
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Clinical review: Inferior vena cava filters in the age of patient-centered outcomes

&
Pages 474-481 | Received 17 Apr 2013, Accepted 06 Aug 2013, Published online: 07 Oct 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Permanent IVC filters. (A) Cordis TrapEase. (B) Boston Scientific Greenfield. (C) Braun Venatech LP.

Figure 1. Permanent IVC filters. (A) Cordis TrapEase. (B) Boston Scientific Greenfield. (C) Braun Venatech LP.

Figure 2. Retrievable IVC filters. (A) Rex Medical Option. (B) Cook Gunther Tulip. (C) Cook Celect. (D) Bard G2x.

Figure 2. Retrievable IVC filters. (A) Rex Medical Option. (B) Cook Gunther Tulip. (C) Cook Celect. (D) Bard G2x.

Table I. Prospective randomized trials on inferior vena cava filters (Citation5–8).

Table II. Comparison of recommendations for IVCF between the 2008 and 2012 ACCP guidelines and the current ACR–SIR guidelines (Citation44–48).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.