600
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Evidence for daily and weekly rhythmicity but not lunar or seasonal rhythmicity of physical activity in a large cohort of individuals from five different countries

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 530-537 | Received 28 Feb 2015, Accepted 13 Aug 2015, Published online: 24 Sep 2015

Figures & data

Table I. Participant characteristics (means ± standard deviations).

Table II. The time intervals used for the four cycles.

Figure 1. Results of the unbiased analysis. The bars represent mean values (± SEM) of physical activity (in counts per hour ×1,000) for the four time intervals of each of the four cycles in each of the five countries. Codes for the time intervals are listed in Table II. The results of two-way ANOVAs are shown in Table III. Asterisks indicate probabilities associated with the F statistics obtained in post hoc one-way ANOVAs for each panel: ***P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05. Absence of asterisks indicates P > 0.10. When the main effect is significant, significance of multiple comparisons by Tukey’s test is indicated by lower-case letters: bars with different letters are significantly different from each other.

Figure 1. Results of the unbiased analysis. The bars represent mean values (± SEM) of physical activity (in counts per hour ×1,000) for the four time intervals of each of the four cycles in each of the five countries. Codes for the time intervals are listed in Table II. The results of two-way ANOVAs are shown in Table III. Asterisks indicate probabilities associated with the F statistics obtained in post hoc one-way ANOVAs for each panel: ***P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05. Absence of asterisks indicates P > 0.10. When the main effect is significant, significance of multiple comparisons by Tukey’s test is indicated by lower-case letters: bars with different letters are significantly different from each other.

Table III. Results of two-way ANOVAs for the primary (unbiased) analysis.

Figure 2. Results of the secondary analysis for the combined data set of men and women from the five countries. The bars represent mean values (± SEM) of physical activity (in counts per hour ×1,000). Asterisks indicate probabilities (corrected for multiple testing) associated with the F statistics obtained in one-way ANOVAs for each panel: ***P < 0.0001. Absence of asterisks indicates P > 0.10. When the main effect is significant, significance of multiple comparisons by Tukey’s test is indicated by lower-case letters: bars with different letters are significantly different from each other.

Figure 2. Results of the secondary analysis for the combined data set of men and women from the five countries. The bars represent mean values (± SEM) of physical activity (in counts per hour ×1,000). Asterisks indicate probabilities (corrected for multiple testing) associated with the F statistics obtained in one-way ANOVAs for each panel: ***P < 0.0001. Absence of asterisks indicates P > 0.10. When the main effect is significant, significance of multiple comparisons by Tukey’s test is indicated by lower-case letters: bars with different letters are significantly different from each other.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.