Figures & data
Table I. Descriptive data corresponding to 33 440 subjects included in the study.
Figure 1. Quantification of diagnostic inertia in medical check-ups. CI, confidence intervals of 95%; n=sample size; HTN, arterial hypertension. *Percentage calculated from total number of people with no history of HTN; **percentages calculated from total number of people with abnormal BP reading.
![Figure 1. Quantification of diagnostic inertia in medical check-ups. CI, confidence intervals of 95%; n=sample size; HTN, arterial hypertension. *Percentage calculated from total number of people with no history of HTN; **percentages calculated from total number of people with abnormal BP reading.](/cms/asset/0edb99b4-f92b-47e8-9630-3bbe768762c7/iblo_a_435254_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Quantification of therapeutic inertia in medical check-ups. CI, confidence intervals of 95%; n=sample size; HTN, arterial hypertension. *Percentages calculated from total number of people with history of HTN; **percentages calculated from total number of people with bad control.
![Figure 2. Quantification of therapeutic inertia in medical check-ups. CI, confidence intervals of 95%; n=sample size; HTN, arterial hypertension. *Percentages calculated from total number of people with history of HTN; **percentages calculated from total number of people with bad control.](/cms/asset/163fddce-8050-46bb-8e32-ea6c23faeb60/iblo_a_435254_f0002_b.gif)
Table IIa. Qualitative variables associated with clinical inertia; bivariate analysis.
Table IIb. Quantitative variables associated with clinical inertia; bivariate analysis.
Table III. Variables associated with inertia; multivariate analysis.