301
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Maximal Levator Muscle Resection for Primary Congenital Blepharoptosis with Poor Levator Function

, , , , &
Pages 270-275 | Received 17 Dec 2014, Accepted 28 Jun 2015, Published online: 04 Sep 2015
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of maximal levator muscle resection surgery in patients with poor levator function. Methods: This prospective study included 29 eyelids of 23 patients who underwent maximal levator resection surgery. Pre- and postoperatively, all patients’ routine ophthalmic examination including evaluation of upper eyelid skin crease positions; levator muscle function (LF), rima palpebrarum (RP), and margin-reflex distance (MRD) measurements were recorded. Outcome was considered successful when the difference between the two upper eyelids was ≤1 mm; if the difference between the two eyelid margins was more than 1 mm and less than 2 mm, it was considered to be satisfactory. More than 2 mm difference was considered to be poor. Results: Mean patient age was 11.3 ± 8.6 years (3 months to 24 years). Mean follow-up time was 22.8 ± 6.9 months (10 to 36 months). Preoperatively mean RP, MRD, and LF measurements were 5.5 ± 1.7 mm, −0.14 ± 1.6 mm, 2.5 ± 1.4 mm (0–4 mm), respectively. Preoperatively, eight (27,6%) patients had skin crease. Abnormal head posture was detected in eight (34.8%) of the patients. Postoperatively, RP, MRD, and LF values increased significantly (p < 0.05). Mean RP, MRD, and LF measurements were 8.3 ± 1.5 mm, 2.6 ± 1.2 mm, 5.1 ± 2.1 mm, respectively. Fourteen subjects (60.9%) had successful results, two subjects (8.7%) had satisfactory results, and seven subjects (30.4%) had poor results. Abnormal head postures of all patients were resolved. Conclusions: Maximal levator resection may be a good alternative method to frontalis suspension in congenital blepharoptosis patients with poor levator function.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interests or financial interests in the materials presented in this paper. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

The authors are grateful to the Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey, and Kafkas University Hospital, Kars, Turkey, for their support.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 530.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.