2,432
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Febuxostat for treating allopurinol-resistant hyperuricemia in patients with chronic kidney disease

, , , , &
Pages 225-231 | Received 25 Jul 2013, Accepted 30 Aug 2013, Published online: 24 Oct 2013

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population.

Figure 1. Change in serum uric acid concentration (mean ± SD) before and after the start of febuxostat treatment (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). ***p < 0.001 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 1. Change in serum uric acid concentration (mean ± SD) before and after the start of febuxostat treatment (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). ***p < 0.001 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 2. Change in serum uric acid concentrations (mean ± SD) during febuxostat treatment stratified by (a) gender and (b) baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2). ***p < 0.001 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 2. Change in serum uric acid concentrations (mean ± SD) during febuxostat treatment stratified by (a) gender and (b) baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2). ***p < 0.001 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 3. Change in eGFR (mean ± SD) before and after the start of febuxostat treatment in patients with a baseline eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). *p < 0.05 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 3. Change in eGFR (mean ± SD) before and after the start of febuxostat treatment in patients with a baseline eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). *p < 0.05 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Table 2. Change from baseline in eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) after the start of febuxostat treatment.

Table 3. Correlation between the change in serum uric acid concentrations and change in eGFR at 6 months after the start of febuxostat treatment.

Figure 4. Change in eGFR slope (mean ± SD) before (a) and after (b) the start of febuxostat treatment (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). *p < 0.05 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 4. Change in eGFR slope (mean ± SD) before (a) and after (b) the start of febuxostat treatment (number in parentheses indicates number of patients). *p < 0.05 versus Month 0 (paired t-test).

Figure 5. Change in eGFR slope (mean ± SD) before and after febuxostat treatment stratified by (a) gender and (b) baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus before treatment (paired t-test).

Figure 5. Change in eGFR slope (mean ± SD) before and after febuxostat treatment stratified by (a) gender and (b) baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus before treatment (paired t-test).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.