Figures & data
Figure 1. Renal proximal tubular epithelial cells were treated Methotrexate (1, 10 and 100 μM, n = 6), assessed by MTT. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicles.
![Figure 1. Renal proximal tubular epithelial cells were treated Methotrexate (1, 10 and 100 μM, n = 6), assessed by MTT. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicles.](/cms/asset/cfd804a7-374c-421a-b612-f0bd49226225/irnf_a_1155398_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Renal proximal tubular epithelial cells were treated with 17β-estradiol (100 nm, n = 6), GPER-1 agonist G-1 (100 nm, n = 6), ERα agonist PPT (100 nm, n = 6), ERβ agonist DPN (100 nm, n = 6) for 30 min prior to treatment with methotrexate (10 μM, n = 6) for 48 h. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicles, ++p < 0.01, +++p < 0.001 versus MTX.
![Figure 2. Renal proximal tubular epithelial cells were treated with 17β-estradiol (100 nm, n = 6), GPER-1 agonist G-1 (100 nm, n = 6), ERα agonist PPT (100 nm, n = 6), ERβ agonist DPN (100 nm, n = 6) for 30 min prior to treatment with methotrexate (10 μM, n = 6) for 48 h. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicles, ++p < 0.01, +++p < 0.001 versus MTX.](/cms/asset/70fad557-00f6-4a7b-b516-395ad0b7f741/irnf_a_1155398_f0002_b.jpg)