Figures & data
Figure 1. OMT ameliorates renal injury and interstitial matrix disposition in UUO at 7 days after surgery. (A) Representative micrographs of HE staining, immunohistochemical staining for COI-1 and FN expression, and original magnification ×200. (B, C) Quantitative analysis of FN and COI-1 for immunohistochemistry staining. (D, E) mRNA levels of COL-1 and FN in the different treated groups. +p < 0.01 versus sham group, *p < 0.01 versus UUO with vehicle-treated group. (Scale bars: 200 μm).
![Figure 1. OMT ameliorates renal injury and interstitial matrix disposition in UUO at 7 days after surgery. (A) Representative micrographs of HE staining, immunohistochemical staining for COI-1 and FN expression, and original magnification ×200. (B, C) Quantitative analysis of FN and COI-1 for immunohistochemistry staining. (D, E) mRNA levels of COL-1 and FN in the different treated groups. +p < 0.01 versus sham group, *p < 0.01 versus UUO with vehicle-treated group. (Scale bars: 200 μm).](/cms/asset/7ba5e802-f644-41d5-837c-b7be9bd2d9e2/irnf_a_1164185_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. OMT suppresses activation of myofibroblasts in obstructed kidneys. (A) Western blot analysis for vimentin and α-SMA in different treatment groups. (B, C) Statistical analysis of relative expression of vimentin and α-SMA. (D, E) mRNA levels of vimentin and α-SMA in the different treated groups. +p < 0.01 versus sham group. *p < 0.05 versus UUO with vehicle-treated group.
![Figure 2. OMT suppresses activation of myofibroblasts in obstructed kidneys. (A) Western blot analysis for vimentin and α-SMA in different treatment groups. (B, C) Statistical analysis of relative expression of vimentin and α-SMA. (D, E) mRNA levels of vimentin and α-SMA in the different treated groups. +p < 0.01 versus sham group. *p < 0.05 versus UUO with vehicle-treated group.](/cms/asset/da6fd371-4dcb-46c2-8218-c00cdfb3867b/irnf_a_1164185_f0002_b.jpg)