Figures & data
Figure 1. (A) Relationship between intensity at 2θ = 17.78° from XRD of CA and reaction time. (B) Ratio of GO-COO-β-CD to CA.
![Figure 1. (A) Relationship between intensity at 2θ = 17.78° from XRD of CA and reaction time. (B) Ratio of GO-COO-β-CD to CA.](/cms/asset/7fbc038a-9ed6-4438-be44-ec706756071e/idrd_a_846997_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Variation of particle size and PDI of GO-COO-β-CD/CA with temperatures. Inset shows the digital pictures of GO-COO-β-CD/CA aqueous solutions.
![Figure 2. Variation of particle size and PDI of GO-COO-β-CD/CA with temperatures. Inset shows the digital pictures of GO-COO-β-CD/CA aqueous solutions.](/cms/asset/e45fdd5b-5784-43f3-bbff-bdbe412f8b20/idrd_a_846997_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1. Particle size and PDI of GO-COO-β-CD/CA at different temperatures.
Figure 3. (A) Optical images of inhibition zone for GO-COO-β-CD (a), CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (c) and physical mixture of GO-COO-β-CD and CA (d) against E. coli. (B) Optical images of inhibition zone for GO-COO-β-CD (a), CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (c) and physical mixture of GO-COO-β-CD and CA (d) against S. aureus.
![Figure 3. (A) Optical images of inhibition zone for GO-COO-β-CD (a), CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (c) and physical mixture of GO-COO-β-CD and CA (d) against E. coli. (B) Optical images of inhibition zone for GO-COO-β-CD (a), CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (c) and physical mixture of GO-COO-β-CD and CA (d) against S. aureus.](/cms/asset/b9acdab6-b543-4ab1-85fe-1d118c03b31d/idrd_a_846997_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 2. Diameter of inhibition zone of GO-COO-β-CD, CA, GO-COO-β-CD/CA and physical mixture of GO-COO-β-CD and CA.
Figure 4. (A) MIC of GO-COO-β-CD (a) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA (b) at different apparent concentrations for E. coli. (B) MIC of GO-COO-β-CD (a) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA and (b) at different apparent concentrations for S. aureus..
![Figure 4. (A) MIC of GO-COO-β-CD (a) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA (b) at different apparent concentrations for E. coli. (B) MIC of GO-COO-β-CD (a) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA and (b) at different apparent concentrations for S. aureus..](/cms/asset/15770319-b01a-4398-a943-c2f35df7c26f/idrd_a_846997_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. (A) Inhibition curve for E. coli at apparent concentrations of 0 (a), 2 (b), 1 (c), 0.5 (d), 0.25 (e) and 0.125 mg/ml (f). (B) Inhibition curve for S. aureus at apparent concentrations of 0 (a), 2 (b), 1 (c), 0.5 (d), 0.25 (e) and 0.125 mg/ml (f).
![Figure 5. (A) Inhibition curve for E. coli at apparent concentrations of 0 (a), 2 (b), 1 (c), 0.5 (d), 0.25 (e) and 0.125 mg/ml (f). (B) Inhibition curve for S. aureus at apparent concentrations of 0 (a), 2 (b), 1 (c), 0.5 (d), 0.25 (e) and 0.125 mg/ml (f).](/cms/asset/db01a19c-1ae0-48a1-ac9e-183373442179/idrd_a_846997_f0005_b.jpg)
Table 3. Antimicrobial percentage of GO-COO-β-CD/CA for E. coli and S. aureus..
Table 4. Results of hemolysis test of GO-COO-β-CD, CA and GO-COO-β-CD/CA.
Figure 6. Recalcification time of PPP (a), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD (c), CA (d) and PPP+Ca2+ (e).
![Figure 6. Recalcification time of PPP (a), GO-COO-β-CD/CA (b), GO-COO-β-CD (c), CA (d) and PPP+Ca2+ (e).](/cms/asset/5ddd95ef-cd5e-4ac6-a3fd-39ddde908af7/idrd_a_846997_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Morphology of HEK 293 cells after culture for 48 h on negative control (a), GO-COO-β-CD (b), CA (c) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA (d).
![Figure 7. Morphology of HEK 293 cells after culture for 48 h on negative control (a), GO-COO-β-CD (b), CA (c) and GO-COO-β-CD/CA (d).](/cms/asset/eacabbbb-950a-400e-aead-36711c4b2a25/idrd_a_846997_f0007_b.jpg)
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of GO-COO-β-CD, CA and GO-COO-β-CD/CA.