Figures & data
Table 1. Independent factors and observed values of the dependent factors (responses) (n = 3).
Figure 3. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on particle size.
![Figure 3. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on particle size.](/cms/asset/8f4ae648-369b-40c9-a436-063b49f2b615/idrd_a_1002947_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on entrapment efficiency.
![Figure 4. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on entrapment efficiency.](/cms/asset/8caf2a7c-cda8-4cea-b7b8-ec10e214df98/idrd_a_1002947_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on loading capacity.
![Figure 5. Effects of polymer concentration, stabilizer concentration, and homogenization cycle on loading capacity.](/cms/asset/cc3bebc3-2d6d-45fb-90c5-48227988f9c3/idrd_a_1002947_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 2. Level of independent and dependent variables used in experiments.
Table 3. Final optimization formula for PLGA NPs from point prediction (n = 3).
Figure 6. DSC thermograms of PLGA (A), RIS (B), physical mixture of PLGA, and RIS (C), and RIS-loaded PLGA NPs (D).
![Figure 6. DSC thermograms of PLGA (A), RIS (B), physical mixture of PLGA, and RIS (C), and RIS-loaded PLGA NPs (D).](/cms/asset/bf742b39-4c34-4ba2-88ce-a2267b1afcce/idrd_a_1002947_f0006_b.jpg)