2,253
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Aloe-emodin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: formulation design and in vitro anti-cancer study

, , , &
Pages 666-674 | Received 08 Dec 2013, Accepted 08 Jan 2014, Published online: 11 Feb 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of AE. (B) Effect of HPH pressure and cycle times on particle size. (C) Effect of lipid concentration on particle size and zeta-potential of AE-SLNs at 10, 20 and 30 mg/ml. (D) Effect of different proportion of surfactant to lipid on particle size and zeta-potential.

Figure 1. (A) Chemical structure of AE. (B) Effect of HPH pressure and cycle times on particle size. (C) Effect of lipid concentration on particle size and zeta-potential of AE-SLNs at 10, 20 and 30 mg/ml. (D) Effect of different proportion of surfactant to lipid on particle size and zeta-potential.

Table 1. Effect of lipid materials on particle size and zeta potential of AE-SLNs.

Table 2. Effect of different surfactants on particle size and zeta potential of AE-SLNs.

Figure 2. Physical characterization result of AE-SLNs. (A) The particle size distribution of AE-SLNs. (B) Transmission electron microscopy of AE-SLNs.

Figure 2. Physical characterization result of AE-SLNs. (A) The particle size distribution of AE-SLNs. (B) Transmission electron microscopy of AE-SLNs.

Table 3. The results of formulation assay.

Figure 3. DSC thermogram of free AE, lipid material, physical mixture and AE-SLNs. The characteristic peaks of AE crystals and lipid material appeared at 224 °C and 62 °C respectively, but the thermogram of AE-SLNs presented only one characteristic peak at 51 °C, revealing that AE-SLNs have been successfully prepared.

Figure 3. DSC thermogram of free AE, lipid material, physical mixture and AE-SLNs. The characteristic peaks of AE crystals and lipid material appeared at 224 °C and 62 °C respectively, but the thermogram of AE-SLNs presented only one characteristic peak at 51 °C, revealing that AE-SLNs have been successfully prepared.

Figure 4. In vitro drug release profiles of free AE and AE-SLNs.

Figure 4. In vitro drug release profiles of free AE and AE-SLNs.

Figure 5. Cytotoxicity analysis of free AE, B-SLNs and AE-SLNson MCF-7, HepG2 and MCF-10 A cells at the concentration of 0.1–2.5 μM. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, AE-SLNs versus Free AE.

Figure 5. Cytotoxicity analysis of free AE, B-SLNs and AE-SLNson MCF-7, HepG2 and MCF-10 A cells at the concentration of 0.1–2.5 μM. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, AE-SLNs versus Free AE.

Figure 6. Hoechst 33342 fluorescent staining to detect apoptotic morphology in breast cancer cells, MCF-7 cells were treat with B-SLNs, Free AE and AE-SLNs at 2.5 μM for 48 h. The cell morphology was observed by Incell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA).

Figure 6. Hoechst 33342 fluorescent staining to detect apoptotic morphology in breast cancer cells, MCF-7 cells were treat with B-SLNs, Free AE and AE-SLNs at 2.5 μM for 48 h. The cell morphology was observed by Incell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA).

Figure 7. Quantitative apoptotic measurement in MCF-7 cells with treatment of Free AE, B-SLNs and AE-SLNs. (A). Results of dose dependent effect are expressed as dot plot of AnnexinV-FITC versus PI and representative values are shown. (B). The results are expressed as bar chart. Data as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). **p < 0.01, AE-SLNs versus Free AE.

Figure 7. Quantitative apoptotic measurement in MCF-7 cells with treatment of Free AE, B-SLNs and AE-SLNs. (A). Results of dose dependent effect are expressed as dot plot of AnnexinV-FITC versus PI and representative values are shown. (B). The results are expressed as bar chart. Data as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). **p < 0.01, AE-SLNs versus Free AE.

Figure 8. Cellular uptake amount of AE treated with free AE and AE-SLNs at 5 μMwithin 4 h by MCF-7 cells. Data were expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *p < 0.05, AE-SLNs versus free AE.

Figure 8. Cellular uptake amount of AE treated with free AE and AE-SLNs at 5 μMwithin 4 h by MCF-7 cells. Data were expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *p < 0.05, AE-SLNs versus free AE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.