Figures & data
Table 1. Loading efficacy of different formulations.
Table 2. Optimization of gelatin, formaldehyde and curcumin-β-cyclodextrin complex concentration.
Figure 2. A photomicrograph of 5% gelatin stable foam (a) and curcumin-β-cyclodextrin-loaded gelatin sponge (b) at 100×s.
![Figure 2. A photomicrograph of 5% gelatin stable foam (a) and curcumin-β-cyclodextrin-loaded gelatin sponge (b) at 100×s.](/cms/asset/3d70d13a-1318-4d0d-ad93-13ecc8fceaed/idrd_a_963900_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. In vitro release of drug from sponge containing formaldehyde and without containing formaldehyde.
![Figure 3. In vitro release of drug from sponge containing formaldehyde and without containing formaldehyde.](/cms/asset/38451d8e-d591-4ef3-9c54-039890be1556/idrd_a_963900_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Histopathology of (a) plain cyclodextrin-treated group, (b) gelatin gel-treated group, (c) plain curcumin-treated group, (d) silver sulfadiazine-treated group and (e) curcumin-β-cyclodextrin sponge-treated group.
![Figure 4. Histopathology of (a) plain cyclodextrin-treated group, (b) gelatin gel-treated group, (c) plain curcumin-treated group, (d) silver sulfadiazine-treated group and (e) curcumin-β-cyclodextrin sponge-treated group.](/cms/asset/25fb3c18-57c6-4b71-b949-21d470ae617b/idrd_a_963900_f0004_c.jpg)