Figures & data
Figure 2. Effect of mPEG-DSPE micelles on uptake of probucol in the Caco-2 cell. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 4 (*p < 0.05, versus group of drug).
![Figure 2. Effect of mPEG-DSPE micelles on uptake of probucol in the Caco-2 cell. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 4 (*p < 0.05, versus group of drug).](/cms/asset/ac0f0023-b936-403a-96f3-7ba66e26d835/idrd_a_1028600_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of mPEG-DSPE micelles on transport of probucol in the Caco-2 cell. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 4 (*p < 0.05, versus group of drug).
![Figure 3. Effect of mPEG-DSPE micelles on transport of probucol in the Caco-2 cell. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 4 (*p < 0.05, versus group of drug).](/cms/asset/57b95610-3300-492d-8ef6-ee6c0749e08a/idrd_a_1028600_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. The mean cumulative drug amount in lymph versus time profiles of probucol in the anesthetic rat model. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 5.
![Figure 4. The mean cumulative drug amount in lymph versus time profiles of probucol in the anesthetic rat model. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 5.](/cms/asset/1f785d30-7b24-452b-930b-d37e4bbf3340/idrd_a_1028600_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. The mean cumulative drug amount in lymph versus time profiles of probucol in the conscious rat model. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 5.
![Figure 5. The mean cumulative drug amount in lymph versus time profiles of probucol in the conscious rat model. The data represent the mean ± SD, n = 5.](/cms/asset/669deec2-e171-4d49-8447-fc4a0ba1e8a4/idrd_a_1028600_f0005_c.jpg)